TACAM: Topic And Context Aware Argument Mining
In this work we address the problem of argument search. The purpose of argument search is the distillation of pro and contra arguments for requested topics from large text corpora. In previous works, the usual approach is to use a standard search engine to extract text parts which are relevant to the given topic and subsequently use an argument recognition algorithm to select arguments from them. The main challenge in the argument recognition task, which is also known as argument mining, is that often sentences containing arguments are structurally similar to purely informative sentences without any stance about the topic. In fact, they only differ semantically. Most approaches use topic or search term information only for the first search step and therefore assume that arguments can be classified independently of a topic. We argue that topic information is crucial for argument mining, since the topic defines the semantic context of an argument. Precisely, we propose different models for the classification of arguments, which take information about a topic of an argument into account. Moreover, to enrich the context of a topic and to let models understand the context of the potential argument better, we integrate information from different external sources such as Knowledge Graphs or pre-trained NLP models. Our evaluation shows that considering topic information, especially in connection with external information, provides a significant performance boost for the argument mining task.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument MiningKnowledge GraphsSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Image Retrieval for Arguments Using Stance-Aware Query Expansion
Many forms of argumentation employ images as persuasive means, but research in argument mining has been focused on verbal argumentation so far. This paper shows how to integrate images into argument mining research, spec…
Argument MiningArgument RetrievalImage RetrievalRetrievalDetermining Relative Argument Specificity and Stance for Complex Argumentative Structures
Systems for automatic argument generation and debate require the ability to (1) determine the stance of any claims employed in the argument and (2) assess the specificity of each claim relative to the argument context. E…
SpecificityExplainable Topic-Enhanced Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources
Given a controversial target such as ``nuclear energy'', argument mining aims to identify the argumentative text from heterogeneous sources. Current approaches focus on exploring better ways of integrating the target-ass…
Argument MiningLanguage ModellingSentenceThe Role of Pragmatic and Discourse Context in Determining Argument Impact
Research in the social sciences and psychology has shown that the persuasiveness of an argument depends not only the language employed, but also on attributes of the source/communicator, the audience, and the appropriate…
PersuasivenessDiversity Over Size: On the Effect of Sample and Topic Sizes for Topic-Dependent Argument Mining Datasets
The task of Argument Mining, that is extracting and classifying argument components for a specific topic from large document sources, is an inherently difficult task for machine learning models and humans alike, as large…
Argument MiningBenchmarkingDiversityStance Detection