On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods
Preference elicitation frameworks feature heavily in the research on participatory ethical AI tools and provide a viable mechanism to enquire and incorporate the moral values of various stakeholders. As part of the elicitation process, surveys about moral preferences, opinions, and judgments are typically administered only once to each participant. This methodological practice is reasonable if participants' responses are stable over time such that, all other relevant factors being held constant, their responses today will be the same as their responses to the same questions at a later time. However, we do not know how often that is the case. It is possible that participants' true moral preferences change, are subject to temporary moods or whims, or are influenced by environmental factors we don't track. If participants' moral responses are unstable in such ways, it would raise important methodological and theoretical issues for how participants' true moral preferences, opinions, and judgments can be ascertained. We address this possibility here by asking the same survey participants the same moral questions about which patient should receive a kidney when only one is available ten times in ten different sessions over two weeks, varying only presentation order across sessions. We measured how often participants gave different responses to simple (Study One) and more complicated (Study Two) repeated scenarios. On average, the fraction of times participants changed their responses to controversial scenarios was around 10-18% across studies, and this instability is observed to have positive associations with response time and decision-making difficulty. We discuss the implications of these results for the efficacy of moral preference elicitation, highlighting the role of response instability in causing value misalignment between stakeholders and AI tools trained on their moral judgments.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation
Computational preference elicitation methods are tools used to learn people's preferences quantitatively in a given context. Recent works on preference elicitation advocate for active learning as an efficient method to i…
Active LearningParticipatory Moral AI Is Not Neutral: The Invisible Hand of Developers
As AI systems make more morally loaded decisions across society, one response has been moral preference elicitation. In this approach, researchers poll participants on hypothetical dilemmas and use the aggregated votes t…
Beyond Value Elicitation: Towards Moral Profiles in Early Requirements Engineering via Role-Playing Games and Anthropologist LLMs
This study presents a proof of concept for eliciting and representing the moral profiles of digital system users in Requirements Engineering (RE) by combining immersive role-playing games (RPGs) with large language model…
Moral ScenariosMoral Change or Noise? On Problems of Aligning AI With Temporally Unstable Human Feedback
Alignment methods in moral domains seek to elicit moral preferences of human stakeholders and incorporate them into AI. This presupposes moral preferences as static targets, but such preferences often evolve over time. P…
From Stability to Inconsistency: A Study of Moral Preferences in LLMs
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly integrate into our daily lives, it becomes crucial to understand their implicit biases and moral tendencies. To address this, we introduce a Moral Foundations LLM dataset (MFD…