paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Silencing Empowerment, Allowing Bigotry: Auditing the Moderation of Hate Speech on Twitch

2025-06-09 · Prarabdh Shukla, Wei Yin Chong, Yash Patel, Brennan Schaffner, Danish Pruthi, Arjun Bhagoji

To meet the demands of content moderation, online platforms have resorted to automated systems. Newer forms of real-time engagement($\textit{e.g.}$, users commenting on live streams) on platforms like Twitch exert additional pressures on the latency expected of such moderation systems. Despite their prevalence, relatively little is known about the effectiveness of these systems. In this paper, we conduct an audit of Twitch's automated moderation tool ($\texttt{AutoMod}$) to investigate its effectiveness in flagging hateful content. For our audit, we create streaming accounts to act as siloed test beds, and interface with the live chat using Twitch's APIs to send over $107,000$ comments collated from $4$ datasets. We measure $\texttt{AutoMod}$'s accuracy in flagging blatantly hateful content containing misogyny, racism, ableism and homophobia. Our experiments reveal that a large fraction of hateful messages, up to $94\%$ on some datasets, $\textit{bypass moderation}$. Contextual addition of slurs to these messages results in $100\%$ removal, revealing $\texttt{AutoMod}$'s reliance on slurs as a moderation signal. We also find that contrary to Twitch's community guidelines, $\texttt{AutoMod}$ blocks up to $89.5\%$ of benign examples that use sensitive words in pedagogical or empowering contexts. Overall, our audit points to large gaps in $\texttt{AutoMod}$'s capabilities and underscores the importance for such systems to understand context effectively.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2506.07667

Code (1)

weiyinc11/HateSpeechModerationTwitch 공식 구현

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations

2025-03-03 · David Hartmann, Amin Oueslati, Dimitri Staufer, Lena Pohlmann 외

Commercial content moderation APIs are marketed as scalable solutions to combat online hate speech. However, the reliance on these APIs risks both silencing legitimate speech, called over-moderation, and failing to prote…

Longitudinal Monitoring of LLM Content Moderation of Social Issues

2025-09-24 · Yunlang Dai, Emma Lurie, Danaé Metaxa, Sorelle A. Friedler arxiv

Large language models' (LLMs') outputs are shaped by opaque and frequently-changing company content moderation policies and practices. LLM moderation often takes the form of refusal; models' refusal to produce text about…

Unsupervised Real-Time Control through Variational Empowerment

2017-10-13 · Maximilian Karl, Maximilian Soelch, Philip Becker-Ehmck, Djalel Benbouzid 외

We introduce a methodology for efficiently computing a lower bound to empowerment, allowing it to be used as an unsupervised cost function for policy learning in real-time control. Empowerment, being the channel capacity…

Detecting Adversarial Fine-tuning with Auditing Agents

2025-10-17 · Sarah Egler, John Schulman, Nicholas Carlini arxiv

Large Language Model (LLM) providers expose fine-tuning APIs that let end users fine-tune their frontier LLMs. Unfortunately, it has been shown that an adversary with fine-tuning access to an LLM can bypass safeguards. P…

Online Anti-sexist Speech: Identifying Resistance to Gender Bias in Political Discourse

2025-08-15 · Aditi Dutta, Susan Banducci arxiv

Anti-sexist speech, i.e., public expressions that challenge or resist gendered abuse and sexism, plays a vital role in shaping democratic debate online. Yet automated content moderation systems, increasingly powered by l…