Measuring semantic similarity of clinical trial outcomes using deep pre-trained language representations
Background: Outcomes are variables monitored during a clinical trial to assess the impact of an intervention on humans’ health.Automatic assessment of semantic similarity of trial outcomes is required for a number of tasks, such as detection of outcome switching (unjustified changes of pre-defined outcomes of a trial) and implementation of Core Outcome Sets (minimal sets of outcomes that should be reported in a particular medical domain). Objective: We aimed at building an algorithm for assessing semantic similarity of pairs of primary and reported outcomes.We focused on approaches that do not require manually curated domain-specific resources such as ontologies and thesauri. Methods: We tested several approaches, including single measures of similarity (based on strings, stems and lemmas, paths and distances in an ontology, and vector representations of phrases), classifiers using a combination of single measures as features, and a deep learning approach that consists in fine-tuning pre-trained deep language representations.We tested language models provided by BERT (trained on general-domain texts), BioBERT and SciBERT (trained on biomedical and scientific texts, respectively).We explored the possibility of improving the results by taking into account the variants for referring to an outcome (e.g.the use of a measurement tool name instead on the outcome name; the use of abbreviations).We release an open corpus with annotation for similarity of pairs of outcomes. Results: Classifiers using a combination of single measures as features outperformed the single measures, while deep learning algorithms using BioBERT and SciBERT models outperformed the classifiers.BioBERT reached the best F-measure of 89.75%.The addition of variants of outcomes did not improve the results for the best-performing single measures nor for the classifiers, but it improved the performance of deep learning algorithms: BioBERT achieved an F-measure of93.38%. Conclusions: Deep learning approaches using pre-trained language representations outperformed other approaches for similarity assessment of trial outcomes, without relying on any manually curated domain-specific resources (ontologies and other lexical resources). Addition of variants of outcomes further improved the performance of deep learning algorithms.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Deep LearningSemantic SimilaritySemantic Textual SimilarityMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Automating the Compilation of Potential Core-Outcomes for Clinical Trials
Due to increased access to clinical trial outcomes and analysis, researchers and scientists are able to iterate or improve upon relevant approaches more effectively. However, the metrics and related results of clinical t…
Semantic SimilaritySemantic Textual SimilaritySentenceSentence SimilarityScaling Up Formal Representation of Clinical Trial Protocols in Ensemble Logic Using LLMs: A Preliminary Study
The reliance on unstructured free text for documenting clinical trial protocols creates a significant barrier to automated reasoning, cohort discovery, and trial simulation. The lack of formal structure obscures critical…
Semantic SimilarityClinical Trial Recommendations Using Semantics-Based Inductive Inference and Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Designing a new clinical trial entails many decisions, such as defining a cohort and setting the study objectives to name a few, and therefore can benefit from recommendations based on exhaustive mining of past clinical …
Knowledge Graph Embeddingstext similarityEffective Crowd-Annotation of Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes in the Text of Clinical Trial Reports
The search for Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes (PIO) in clinical trial reports is a critical task in Evidence Based Medicine. For an automatic PIO extraction, high-quality corpora are needed. Obtaining such a c…
Sentencetext similarityEstimand framework and intercurrent events handling for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes
The ICH E9(R1) guideline presents a framework of estimand for clinical trials, proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events (ICEs), and provides a comprehensive discussion and many real-life clinical example…