A causal modeling perspective on decision theory
Decision theory provides a formal framework for how agents should make choices under uncertainty, drawing on ideas from philosophy, probability, and causality. Despite significant progress, the field still lacks a unified modeling language, and key concepts - such as the distinction between subjective and objective elements, or what it means for a decision theory to perform well - are often left implicit. This can make it difficult to evaluate and compare competing theories, particularly in controversial cases. In this paper, we address these issues by introducing a formal framework for decision theory based on nonparametric structural equation models (NPSEMs), a well-established tool in causal inference. NPSEMs provide a unified foundation for representing agents, counterfactuals, and causal relationships, allowing for unambiguous definitions of EDT and CDT. Building on this foundation, we propose a novel decision theory - personal decision theory - which instructs agents to maximize a subjective model of their own counterfactual utility. We introduce a formal performance metric based on hypothetical interventions that enforce a given decision theory across a population - such as might be achieved through education or policy -- and show that, under certain assumptions, personal decision theory is optimal with respect to this metric. Throughout, we use the smoking lesion problem as a running example and conclude with a formal analysis of Newcomb's problem. Our aim is to provide decision theory with a clearer modeling language and firmer evaluative ground, thereby enabling more rigorous comparisons and facilitating conceptual progress in the field.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A novel approach to the relationships between data features -- based on comprehensive examination of mathematical, technological, and causal methodology
The expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised concerns about transparency, accountability, and interpretability, with counterfactual reasoning emerging as a key approach to addressing these issues. However, cu…
Causal InferencecounterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningSequential Extensions of Causal and Evidential Decision Theory
Moving beyond the dualistic view in AI where agent and environment are separated incurs new challenges for decision making, as calculation of expected utility is no longer straightforward. The non-dualistic decision theo…
Decision MakingGenerative Flow Networks: Theory and Applications to Structure Learning
Without any assumptions about data generation, multiple causal models may explain our observations equally well. To avoid selecting a single arbitrary model that could result in unsafe decisions if it does not match real…
Sequential Decision MakingVariational InferenceStrategic Classification is Causal Modeling in Disguise
Consequential decision-making incentivizes individuals to strategically adapt their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. While a long line of work has viewed strategic adaptation as gaming and attempted to mit…
Causal InferenceClassificationDecision MakingGeneral ClassificationTowards Robust Trajectory Representations: Isolating Environmental Confounders with Causal Learning
Trajectory modeling refers to characterizing human movement behavior, serving as a pivotal step in understanding mobility patterns. Nevertheless, existing studies typically ignore the confounding effects of geospatial co…
Representation LearningTrajectory Modeling