A Corpus of eRulemaking User Comments for Measuring Evaluability of Arguments
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument MiningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Argument Identification in Public Comments from eRulemaking
Administrative agencies in the United States receive millions of comments each year concerning proposed agency actions during the eRulemaking process. These comments represent a diversity of arguments in support and oppo…
DiversitySentenceSingle-Pass, Adaptive Natural Language Filtering: Measuring Value in User Generated Comments on Large-Scale, Social Media News Forums
There are large amounts of insight and social discovery potential in mining crowd-sourced comments left on popular news forums like Reddit.com, Tumblr.com, Facebook.com and Hacker News. Unfortunately, due the overwhelmin…
MarketingSentenceAggregating Incomplete Rankings
This study considers the method to derive a ranking of alternatives by aggregating the rankings submitted by several individuals who may not evaluate all of them. The collection of subsets of alternatives that individual…
Placing M-Phasis on the Plurality of Hate: A Feature-Based Corpus of Hate Online
Even though hate speech (HS) online has been an important object of research in the last decade, most HS-related corpora over-simplify the phenomenon of hate by attempting to label user comments as "hate" or "neutral". T…
ArticlesHate Speech DetectionHate, Obscenity, and Insults: Measuring the Exposure of Children to Inappropriate Comments in YouTube
Social media has become an essential part of the daily routines of children and adolescents. Moreover, enormous efforts have been made to ensure the psychological and emotional well-being of young users as well as their …