paper-with-me

Papers

DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions

2021-10-16 · NAACL 2022 7 · Neha Kennard, Tim O'Gorman, Rajarshi Das, Akshay Sharma, Chhandak Bagchi, Matthew Clinton, Pranay Kumar Yelugam, Hamed Zamani, Andrew McCallum

At the foundation of scientific evaluation is the labor-intensive process of peer review. This critical task requires participants to consume vast amounts of highly technical text. Prior work has annotated different aspects of review argumentation, but discourse relations between reviews and rebuttals have yet to be examined. We present DISAPERE, a labeled dataset of 20k sentences contained in 506 review-rebuttal pairs in English, annotated by experts. DISAPERE synthesizes label sets from prior work and extends them to include fine-grained annotation of the rebuttal sentences, characterizing their context in the review and the authors' stance towards review arguments. Further, we annotate every review and rebuttal sentence. We show that discourse cues from rebuttals can shed light on the quality and interpretation of reviews. Further, an understanding of the argumentative strategies employed by the reviewers and authors provides useful signal for area chairs and other decision makers.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2110.08520

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Sentence

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions

2021-11-16 · ACL ARR November 2021 11 · Anonymous

At the foundation of scientific evaluation is the labor-intensive process of peer review. This critical task requires participants to consume vast amounts of highly technical text. Prior work has annotated different aspe…

Sentence

Calibrated Generative AI as Meta-Reviewer: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Discourse Analysis of Reviews of Peer Reviews

2025-09-18 · Gabriela C. Zapata, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, Duane Searsmith arxiv

This study investigates the use of generative AI to support formative assessment through machine generated reviews of peer reviews in graduate online courses in a public university in the United States. Drawing on System…

Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttals

2023-11-07 · Sukannya Purkayastha, Anne Lauscher, Iryna Gurevych

In many domains of argumentation, people's arguments are driven by so-called attitude roots, i.e., underlying beliefs and world views, and their corresponding attitude themes. Given the strength of these latent drivers o…

Sentence

Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge

2026-03-02 · Tatiana Chakravorti, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sourojit Ghosh, Sarah Rajtmajer arxiv

Generative AI tools are increasingly entering academic peer review workflows, raising questions about fairness, accountability, and the legitimacy of evaluative judgment. While these systems promise efficiency gains amid…

A Corpus for Argumentative Writing Support in German

2020-10-26 · COLING 2020 8 · Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Söllner, Siegfried Handschuh 외

In this paper, we present a novel annotation approach to capture claims and premises of arguments and their relations in student-written persuasive peer reviews on business models in German language. We propose an annota…