A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglement
Neural networks are ubiquitous in many tasks, but trusting their predictions is an open issue. Uncertainty quantification is required for many applications, and disentangled aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties are best. In this paper, we generalize methods to produce disentangled uncertainties to work with different uncertainty quantification methods, and evaluate their capability to produce disentangled uncertainties. Our results show that: there is an interaction between learning aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, which is unexpected and violates assumptions on aleatoric uncertainty, some methods like Flipout produce zero epistemic uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty is unreliable in the out-of-distribution setting, and Ensembles provide overall the best disentangling quality. We also explore the error produced by the number of samples hyper-parameter in the sampling softmax function, recommending N > 100 samples. We expect that our formulation and results help practitioners and researchers choose uncertainty methods and expand the use of disentangled uncertainties, as well as motivate additional research into this topic.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
DisentanglementUncertainty QuantificationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Looking at the posterior: accuracy and uncertainty of neural-network predictions
Bayesian inference can quantify uncertainty in the predictions of neural networks using posterior distributions for model parameters and network output. By looking at these posterior distributions, one can separate the o…
Active LearningBayesian InferenceImage ClassificationUncertainty QuantificationWhy Machine Learning Models Fail to Fully Capture Epistemic Uncertainty
In recent years various supervised learning methods that disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty based on second-order distributions have been proposed. We argue that these methods fail to capture critical compon…
Uncertainty QuantificationIntrinsic Randomness in Epidemic Modelling Beyond Statistical Uncertainty
Uncertainty can be classified as either aleatoric (intrinsic randomness) or epistemic (imperfect knowledge of parameters). The majority of frameworks assessing infectious disease risk consider only epistemic uncertainty.…
Disentangling Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in Reinforcement Learning
Characterizing aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty on the predicted rewards can help in building reliable reinforcement learning (RL) systems. Aleatoric uncertainty results from the irreducible environment stochasticity …
reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations
The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution moreover correlates with a model's epist…
Density EstimationOut of Distribution (OOD) Detection