paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

A Hierarchical Network-Oriented Analysis of User Participation in Misinformation Spread on WhatsApp

2021-09-22 · Gabriel Peres Nobre, Carlos H. G. Ferreira, Jussara M. Almeida

WhatsApp emerged as a major communication platform in many countries in the recent years. Despite offering only one-to-one and small group conversations, WhatsApp has been shown to enable the formation of a rich underlying network, crossing the boundaries of existing groups, and with structural properties that favor information dissemination at large. Indeed, WhatsApp has reportedly been used as a forum of misinformation campaigns with significant social, political and economic consequences in several countries. In this article, we aim at complementing recent studies on misinformation spread on WhatsApp, mostly focused on content properties and propagation dynamics, by looking into the network that connects users sharing the same piece of content. Specifically, we present a hierarchical network-oriented characterization of the users engaged in misinformation spread by focusing on three perspectives: individuals, WhatsApp groups and user communities, i.e., groupings of users who, intentionally or not, share the same content disproportionately often. By analyzing sharing and network topological properties, our study offers valuable insights into how WhatsApp users leverage the underlying network connecting different groups to gain large reach in the spread of misinformation on the platform.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2109.10462

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Misinformation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Using Grok to Avoid Personal Attacks While Correcting Misinformation on X

2026-01-06 · Kevin Matthe Caramancion arxiv

Correcting misinformation in public online spaces often exposes users to hostility and ad hominem attacks, discouraging participation in corrective discourse. This study presents empirical evidence that invoking Grok, th…

University of Copenhagen Participation in TREC Health Misinformation Track 2020

2021-03-03 · Lucas Chaves Lima, Dustin Brandon Wright, Isabelle Augenstein, Maria Maistro

In this paper, we describe our participation in the TREC Health Misinformation Track 2020. We submitted $11$ runs to the Total Recall Task and 13 runs to the Ad Hoc task. Our approach consists of 3 steps: (1) we create a…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMisinformationStance Detection

Beyond the Crowd: LLM-Augmented Community Notes for Governing Health Misinformation

2025-10-13 · Jiaying Wu, Zihang Fu, Haonan Wang, Fanxiao Li 외 arxiv

Community Notes, the crowd-sourced misinformation governance system on X (formerly Twitter), allows users to flag misleading posts, attach contextual notes, and rate the notes' helpfulness. However, our empirical analysi…

Justice in Misinformation Detection Systems: An Analysis of Algorithms, Stakeholders, and Potential Harms

2022-04-28 · Terrence Neumann, Maria De-Arteaga, Sina Fazelpour

Faced with the scale and surge of misinformation on social media, many platforms and fact-checking organizations have turned to algorithms for automating key parts of misinformation detection pipelines. While offering a …

Fact CheckingFairnessMisinformation

A Modality-level Explainable Framework for Misinformation Checking in Social Networks

2022-12-08 · Vítor Lourenço, Aline Paes

The widespread of false information is a rising concern worldwide with critical social impact, inspiring the emergence of fact-checking organizations to mitigate misinformation dissemination. However, human-driven verifi…

Fact CheckingMisinformation