paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

A Multi-site Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-field Digital Mammography Images and Synthetic Mammography Images

2020-01-23 · Thomas P. Matthews, Sadanand Singh, Brent Mombourquette, Jason Su, Meet P. Shah, Stefano Pedemonte, Aaron Long, David Maffit, Jenny Gurney, Rodrigo Morales Hoil, Nikita Ghare, Douglas Smith, Stephen M. Moore, Susan C. Marks, Richard L. Wahl

Purpose: To develop a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density deep learning (DL) model in a multi-site setting for synthetic two-dimensional mammography (SM) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis exams using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images and limited SM data. Materials and Methods: A DL model was trained to predict BI-RADS breast density using FFDM images acquired from 2008 to 2017 (Site 1: 57492 patients, 187627 exams, 750752 images) for this retrospective study. The FFDM model was evaluated using SM datasets from two institutions (Site 1: 3842 patients, 3866 exams, 14472 images, acquired from 2016 to 2017; Site 2: 7557 patients, 16283 exams, 63973 images, 2015 to 2019). Each of the three datasets were then split into training, validation, and test datasets. Adaptation methods were investigated to improve performance on the SM datasets and the effect of dataset size on each adaptation method is considered. Statistical significance was assessed using confidence intervals (CI), estimated by bootstrapping. Results: Without adaptation, the model demonstrated substantial agreement with the original reporting radiologists for all three datasets (Site 1 FFDM: linearly-weighted $\kappa_w$ = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.76]; Site 1 SM: $\kappa_w$ = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.78]; Site 2 SM: $\kappa_w$ = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.75]). With adaptation, performance improved for Site 2 (Site 1: $\kappa_w$ = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.79], 0.71 vs 0.72, P = .80; Site 2: $\kappa_w$ = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.81], 0.72 vs 0.79, P $<$ .001) using only 500 SM images from that site. Conclusion: A BI-RADS breast density DL model demonstrated strong performance on FFDM and SM images from two institutions without training on SM images and improved using few SM images.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2001.08383

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Test 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Federated Learning for Breast Density Classification: A Real-World Implementation

2020-09-03 · Holger R. Roth, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Nir Neumark 외

Building robust deep learning-based models requires large quantities of diverse training data. In this study, we investigate the use of federated learning (FL) to build medical imaging classification models in a real-wor…

breast density classificationClassificationFederated LearningGeneral Classification

Evaluating Federated Learning approaches for mammography under breast density heterogeneity

2026-05-09 · Gonzalo Iñaki Quintana, Franco Martin Di Maria, Laurence Vancamberg arxiv

Breast density is a key factor that influences mammography interpretation and is a major source of heterogeneity in multicenter datasets. Such heterogeneity poses challenges for collaborative machine learning across inst…

Image ClassificationFederated Learning

High-resolution synthesis of high-density breast mammograms: Application to improved fairness in deep learning based mass detection

2022-09-20 · Lidia Garrucho, Kaisar Kushibar, Richard Osuala, Oliver Diaz 외

Computer-aided detection systems based on deep learning have shown good performance in breast cancer detection. However, high-density breasts show poorer detection performance since dense tissues can mask or even simulat…

Breast Cancer DetectionData AugmentationDomain AdaptationDomain Generalization+3

Photometric Transformer Networks and Label Adjustment for Breast Density Prediction

2019-05-08 · Jaehwan Lee, Donggeon Yoo, Jung Yin Huh, Hyo-Eun Kim

Grading breast density is highly sensitive to normalization settings of digital mammogram as the density is tightly correlated with the distribution of pixel intensity. Also, the grade varies with readers due to uncertai…

PredictionPseudo Label

Deep Learning Predicts Mammographic Breast Density in Clinical Breast Ultrasound Images

2024-10-31 · Arianna Bunnell, Dustin Valdez, Thomas K. Wolfgruber, Brandon Quon 외

Background: Breast density, as derived from mammographic images and defined by the American College of Radiology's Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cance…