A Neuro-Symbolic Multi-Agent Approach to Legal-Cybersecurity Knowledge Integration
The growing intersection of cybersecurity and law creates a complex information space where traditional legal research tools struggle to deal with nuanced connections between cases, statutes, and technical vulnerabilities. This knowledge divide hinders collaboration between legal experts and cybersecurity professionals. To address this important gap, this work provides a first step towards intelligent systems capable of navigating the increasingly intricate cyber-legal domain. We demonstrate promising initial results on multilingual tasks.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities
Cybersecurity demands both rapid pattern recognition and deliberative reasoning, yet purely neural or purely symbolic approaches each address only one side of this duality. Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) AI bridges this gap by in…
Intrusion DetectionKnowledge-enhanced Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity and Privacy
Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an emerging and quickly advancing field that combines the subsymbolic strengths of (deep) neural networks and explicit, symbolic knowledge contained in knowledge graphs to e…
Knowledge GraphsAccurate Legal Reasoning at Scale: Neuro-Symbolic Offloading and Structural Auditability for Robust Legal Adjudication
Legal texts often contain computational legal clauses--provisions whose understanding requires complex logic. While frontier Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) can describe such clauses, building production-ready systems is l…
Legal ReasoningNeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but their lack of interpretable reasoning and tendency to hallucinate pose significant challenges for legal applications. While LLMs show promise…
Beyond Imperfect Alternatives with Rulemapping: A Neuro-Symbolic Case Study on Online Hate Speech
Automating legal reasoning forces a choice between imperfect alternatives: symbolic systems offer transparency but struggle with ambiguity, whereas neural systems handle natural language flexibly but lack verifiability. …
Legal Reasoning