paper-with-me

Papers

A Novel Approach to Fairness in Automated Decision-Making using Affective Normalization

2022-05-02 · Jesse Hoey, Gabrielle Chan

Any decision, such as one about who to hire, involves two components. First, a rational component, i.e., they have a good education, they speak clearly. Second, an affective component, based on observables such as visual features of race and gender, and possibly biased by stereotypes. Here we propose a method for measuring the affective, socially biased, component, thus enabling its removal. That is, given a decision-making process, these affective measurements remove the affective bias in the decision, rendering it fair across a set of categories defined by the method itself. We thus propose that this may solve three key problems in intersectional fairness: (1) the definition of categories over which fairness is a consideration; (2) an infinite regress into smaller and smaller groups; and (3) ensuring a fair distribution based on basic human rights or other prior information. The primary idea in this paper is that fairness biases can be measured using affective coherence, and that this can be used to normalize outcome mappings. We aim for this conceptual work to expose a novel method for handling fairness problems that uses emotional coherence as an independent measure of bias that goes beyond statistical parity.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2205.00819

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Decision MakingFairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Fairness as a Program Property

2016-10-19 · Aws Albarghouthi, Loris D'Antoni, Samuel Drews, Aditya Nori

We explore the following question: Is a decision-making program fair, for some useful definition of fairness? First, we describe how several algorithmic fairness questions can be phrased as program verification problems.…

Decision MakingFairness

Causal Fairness for Outcome Control

2023-06-08 · NeurIPS 2023 11

As society transitions towards an AI-based decision-making infrastructure, an ever-increasing number of decisions once under control of humans are now delegated to automated systems. Even though such developments make va…

AttributeDecision MakingFairness

Integrating Psychometrics and Computing Perspectives on Bias and Fairness in Affective Computing: A Case Study of Automated Video Interviews

2023-05-04 · Brandon M Booth, Louis Hickman, Shree Krishna Subburaj, Louis Tay 외

We provide a psychometric-grounded exposition of bias and fairness as applied to a typical machine learning pipeline for affective computing. We expand on an interpersonal communication framework to elucidate how to iden…

Fairness

Fairness Behind a Veil of Ignorance: A Welfare Analysis for Automated Decision Making

2018-06-13 · NeurIPS 2018 12 · Hoda Heidari, Claudio Ferrari, Krishna P. Gummadi, Andreas Krause

We draw attention to an important, yet largely overlooked aspect of evaluating fairness for automated decision making systems---namely risk and welfare considerations. Our proposed family of measures corresponds to the l…

Decision MakingFairness

From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classification

2017-06-30 · NeurIPS 2017 12 · Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, Krishna P. Gummadi 외

The adoption of automated, data-driven decision making in an ever expanding range of applications has raised concerns about its potential unfairness towards certain social groups. In this context, a number of recent stud…

ClassificationDecision MakingFairnessGeneral Classification