paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

A Perceptually Weighted Rank Correlation Indicator for Objective Image Quality Assessment

2017-05-15 · Qingbo Wu, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, King N. Ngan

In the field of objective image quality assessment (IQA), the Spearman's $\rho$ and Kendall's $\tau$ are two most popular rank correlation indicators, which straightforwardly assign uniform weight to all quality levels and assume each pair of images are sortable. They are successful for measuring the average accuracy of an IQA metric in ranking multiple processed images. However, two important perceptual properties are ignored by them as well. Firstly, the sorting accuracy (SA) of high quality images are usually more important than the poor quality ones in many real world applications, where only the top-ranked images would be pushed to the users. Secondly, due to the subjective uncertainty in making judgement, two perceptually similar images are usually hardly sortable, whose ranks do not contribute to the evaluation of an IQA metric. To more accurately compare different IQA algorithms, we explore a perceptually weighted rank correlation indicator in this paper, which rewards the capability of correctly ranking high quality images, and suppresses the attention towards insensitive rank mistakes. More specifically, we focus on activating `valid' pairwise comparison towards image quality, whose difference exceeds a given sensory threshold (ST). Meanwhile, each image pair is assigned an unique weight, which is determined by both the quality level and rank deviation. By modifying the perception threshold, we can illustrate the sorting accuracy with a more sophisticated SA-ST curve, rather than a single rank correlation coefficient. The proposed indicator offers a new insight for interpreting visual perception behaviors. Furthermore, the applicability of our indicator is validated in recommending robust IQA metrics for both the degraded and enhanced image data.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1705.05126

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Image Quality Assessment

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

SI-FID: Only One Objective Indicator for Evaluating Stitched Images

2024-04-22 · Xinrui Zhang, Shengwei Guo, Guobing Sun

Image quality evaluation accurately is vital in developing image stitching algorithms as it directly reflects the algorithms progress. However, commonly used objective indicators always produce inconsistent and even conf…

Contrastive LearningData AugmentationImage Stitching

Multi-Weight Ranking for Multi-Criteria Decision Making

2023-12-04 · Andreas H Hamel, Daniel Kostner

Cone distribution functions from statistics are turned into Multi-Criteria Decision Making tools. It is demonstrated that this procedure can be considered as an upgrade of the weighted sum scalarization insofar as it abs…

Decision Making

A Novel Pareto-optimal Ranking Method for Comparing Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms

2024-11-27 · Amin Ibrahim, Azam Asilian Bidgoli, Shahryar Rahnamayan, Kalyanmoy Deb

As the interest in multi- and many-objective optimization algorithms grows, the performance comparison of these algorithms becomes increasingly important. A large number of performance indicators for multi-objective opti…

A multi-factor market-neutral investment strategy for New York Stock Exchange equities

2024-12-16 · Georgios M. Gkolemis, Adwin Richie Lee, Amine Roudani

This report presents a systematic market-neutral, multi-factor investment strategy for New York Stock Exchange equities with the objective of delivering steady returns while minimizing correlation with the market. A robu…

feature selection

Cost-Sensitive Conformal Training with Provably Controllable Learning Bounds

2025-11-22 · Xuesong Jia, Yuanjie Shi, Ziquan Liu, Yi Xu 외 arxiv

Conformal prediction (CP) is a general framework to quantify the predictive uncertainty of machine learning models that uses a set prediction to include the true label with a valid probability. To align the uncertainty m…