A Spoofing Benchmark for the 2018 Voice Conversion Challenge: Leveraging from Spoofing Countermeasures for Speech Artifact Assessment
Voice conversion (VC) aims at conversion of speaker characteristic without
altering content. Due to training data limitations and modeling imperfections,
it is difficult to achieve believable speaker mimicry without introducing
processing artifacts; performance assessment of VC, therefore, usually involves
both speaker similarity and quality evaluation by a human panel. As a
time-consuming, expensive, and non-reproducible process, it hinders rapid
prototyping of new VC technology. We address artifact assessment using an
alternative, objective approach leveraging from prior work on spoofing
countermeasures (CMs) for automatic speaker verification. Therein, CMs are used
for rejecting fake' inputs such as replayed, synthetic or converted speech but
their potential for automatic speech artifact assessment remains unknown. This
study serves to fill that gap. As a supplement to subjective results for the
2018 Voice Conversion Challenge (VCC'18) data, we configure a standard
constant-Q cepstral coefficient CM to quantify the extent of processing
artifacts. Equal error rate (EER) of the CM, a confusability index of VC
samples with real human speech, serves as our artifact measure. Two clusters of
VCC'18 entries are identified: low-quality ones with detectable artifacts (low
EERs), and higher quality ones with less artifacts. None of the VCC'18 systems,
however, is perfect: all EERs are < 30 % (the ideal' value would be 50 %). Our
preliminary findings suggest potential of CMs outside of their original
application, as a supplemental optimization and benchmarking tool to enhance VC
technology.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
BenchmarkingSpeaker VerificationVoice ConversionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
One-class learning towards generalized voice spoofing detection
Human voices can be used to authenticate the identity of the speaker, but the automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems are vulnerable to voice spoofing attacks, such as impersonation, replay, text-to-speech, and voic…
Speaker Verificationtext-to-speechText to SpeechVoice Anti-spoofing+1Identifying Source Speakers for Voice Conversion based Spoofing Attacks on Speaker Verification Systems
An automatic speaker verification system aims to verify the speaker identity of a speech signal. However, a voice conversion system could manipulate a person's speech signal to make it sound like another speaker's voice …
Speaker IdentificationSpeaker VerificationVoice ConversionVoice Spoofing Countermeasures: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, experimental analysis of generalizability, open challenges, and the way forward
Malicious actors may seek to use different voice-spoofing attacks to fool ASV systems and even use them for spreading misinformation. Various countermeasures have been proposed to detect these spoofing attacks. Due to th…
MisinformationSpeaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisVoice ConversionA Practical Guide to Logical Access Voice Presentation Attack Detection
Voice-based human-machine interfaces with an automatic speaker verification (ASV) component are commonly used in the market. However, the threat from presentation attacks is also growing since attackers can use recent sp…
Artifact DetectionSpeaker VerificationSpeech Synthesistext-to-speech+2Replay Spoofing Countermeasure Using Autoencoder and Siamese Network on ASVspoof 2019 Challenge
Automatic Speaker Verification (ASV) is the process of identifying a person based on the voice presented to a system. Different synthetic approaches allow spoofing to deceive ASV systems (ASVs), whether using techniques …
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisVoice Conversion