A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning
The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingDecision Making Under UncertaintyFairnessUncertainty QuantificationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods
The comprehensive integration of machine learning healthcare models within clinical practice remains suboptimal, notwithstanding the proliferation of high-performing solutions reported in the literature. A predominant fa…
Medical Image AnalysisUncertainty QuantificationPlanning and Learning: Path-Planning for Autonomous Vehicles, a Review of the Literature
This short review aims to make the reader familiar with state-of-the-art works relating to planning, scheduling and learning. First, we study state-of-the-art planning algorithms. We give a brief introduction of neural n…
Autonomous Vehiclesreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning (RL)SchedulingUncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has gained traction in an attempt to improve the interpretability and robustness of machine learning predictions. Specifically (medical) biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), el…
DiagnosticEEGElectrocardiography (ECG)Electromyography (EMG)+2A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Reinforcement Learning-Model Predictive Control Integration for Linear Systems
The integration of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for constrained decision-making and adaptive control. MPC offers structured optimization, explicit con…
Reinforcement LearningA Review of the Gumbel-max Trick and its Extensions for Discrete Stochasticity in Machine Learning
The Gumbel-max trick is a method to draw a sample from a categorical distribution, given by its unnormalized (log-)probabilities. Over the past years, the machine learning community has proposed several extensions of thi…
BIG-bench Machine Learning