A Study in Contradiction: Data and Annotation for AIDA Focusing on Informational Conflict in Russia-Ukraine Relations
This paper describes data resources created for Phase 1 of the DARPA Active Interpretation of Disparate Alternatives (AIDA) program, which aims to develop language technology that can help humans manage large volumes of sometimes conflicting information to develop a comprehensive understanding of events around the world, even when such events are described in multiple media and languages. Especially important is the need for the technology to be capable of building multiple hypotheses to account for alternative interpretations of data imbued with informational conflict. The corpus described here is designed to support these goals. It focuses on the domain of Russia-Ukraine relations and contains multimedia source data in English, Russian and Ukrainian, annotated to support development and evaluation of systems that perform extraction of entities, events, and relations from individual multimedia documents, aggregate the information across documents and languages, and produce multiple “hypotheses” about what has happened. This paper describes source data collection, annotation, and assessment.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ARAIDA: Analogical Reasoning-Augmented Interactive Data Annotation
Human annotation is a time-consuming task that requires a significant amount of effort. To address this issue, interactive data annotation utilizes an annotation model to provide suggestions for humans to approve or corr…
RaidaR: A Rich Annotated Image Dataset of Rainy Street Scenes
We introduce RaidaR, a rich annotated image dataset of rainy street scenes, to support autonomous driving research. The new dataset contains the largest number of rainy images (58,542) to date, 5,000 of which provide sem…
Autonomous DrivingData AugmentationImage-to-Image TranslationRain Removal+2"I'm Not Mad": Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradiction
Natural language inference requires reasoning about contradictions, negations, and their commonsense implications. Given a simple premise (e.g., "I'm mad at you"), humans can reason about the varying shades of contradict…
Natural Language InferenceNegation``I'm Not Mad'': Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradiction
Natural language inference requires reasoning about contradictions, negations, and their commonsense implications. Given a simple premise (e.g., {``}I{'}m mad at you{''}), humans can reason about the varying shades of co…
Natural Language InferenceNegationContradictions
Trustworthy AI requires reasoning systems that are not only powerful but also transparent and reliable. Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) is central to formal reasoning, yet classical binary resolution remains limited, as …
Automated Theorem Proving