A Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Practical and Automatic Domain Adaptation
Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) methods facilitate the transfer of models to target domains without labels. However, these methods necessitate a labeled target validation set for hyper-parameter tuning and model selection. In this paper, we aim to find an evaluation metric capable of assessing the quality of a transferred model without access to target validation labels. We begin with the metric based on mutual information of the model prediction. Through empirical analysis, we identify three prevalent issues with this metric: 1) It does not account for the source structure. 2) It can be easily attacked. 3) It fails to detect negative transfer caused by the over-alignment of source and target features. To address the first two issues, we incorporate source accuracy into the metric and employ a new MLP classifier that is held out during training, significantly improving the result. To tackle the final issue, we integrate this enhanced metric with data augmentation, resulting in a novel unsupervised UDA metric called the Augmentation Consistency Metric (ACM). Additionally, we empirically demonstrate the shortcomings of previous experiment settings and conduct large-scale experiments to validate the effectiveness of our proposed metric. Furthermore, we employ our metric to automatically search for the optimal hyper-parameter set, achieving superior performance compared to manually tuned sets across four common benchmarks. Codes will be available soon.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Data AugmentationDomain AdaptationModel SelectionUnsupervised Domain AdaptationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
We investigate evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation systems where supervised labels, such as task completion, are not available. Recent works in response generation have adopted metrics from machine transl…
Machine TranslationResponse GenerationTranslationMeaningful Pose-Based Sign Language Evaluation
We present a comprehensive study on meaningfully evaluating sign language utterances in the form of human skeletal poses. The study covers keypoint distance-based, embedding-based, and back-translation-based metrics. We …
Sign Language TranslationUnsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time-series: An Extensive Evaluation and Analysis of State-of-the-art Methods
Unsupervised anomaly detection in time-series has been extensively investigated in the literature. Notwithstanding the relevance of this topic in numerous application fields, a comprehensive and extensive evaluation of r…
Anomaly DetectionTime SeriesTime Series AnalysisTime Series Anomaly Detection+1ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning
Large language models show improved downstream task performance when prompted to generate step-by-step reasoning to justify their final answers. These reasoning steps greatly improve model interpretability and verificati…
InformativenessText GenerationUSR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation
The lack of meaningful automatic evaluation metrics for dialog has impeded open-domain dialog research. Standard language generation metrics have been shown to be ineffective for evaluating dialog models. To this end, th…
Dialogue EvaluationOpen-Domain DialogText Generation