A Survey of Incremental Transfer Learning: Combining Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning and Domain Incremental Learning for Multicenter Collaboration
Due to data privacy constraints, data sharing among multiple clinical centers is restricted, which impedes the development of high performance deep learning models from multicenter collaboration. Naive weight transfer methods share intermediate model weights without raw data and hence can bypass data privacy restrictions. However, performance drops are typically observed when the model is transferred from one center to the next because of the forgetting problem. Incremental transfer learning, which combines peer-to-peer federated learning and domain incremental learning, can overcome the data privacy issue and meanwhile preserve model performance by using continual learning techniques. In this work, a conventional domain/task incremental learning framework is adapted for incremental transfer learning. A comprehensive survey on the efficacy of different regularization-based continual learning methods for multicenter collaboration is performed. The influences of data heterogeneity, classifier head setting, network optimizer, model initialization, center order, and weight transfer type have been investigated thoroughly. Our framework is publicly accessible to the research community for further development.
Code (2)
Tasks
Continual LearningFederated LearningIncremental LearningTransfer LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Survey
In peer mechanisms, the competitors for a prize also determine who wins. Each competitor may be asked to rank, grade, or nominate peers for the prize. Since the prize can be valuable, such as financial aid, course grades…
SurveySystematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale
Peer Assessment is a task of analysis and commenting on student's writing by peers, is core of all educational components both in campus and in MOOC's. However, with the sheer scale of MOOC's & its inherent personalised …
Knowledge TracingSurveyCan AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
Peer review is a multi-stage process involving reviews, rebuttals, meta-reviews, final decisions, and subsequent manuscript revisions. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have motivated methods that assist or…
PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs
Peer review is an essential process to determine the quality of papers submitted to scientific conferences or journals. However, it is subjective and prone to biases. Several studies have been conducted to apply techniqu…
Decision MakingFew-Shot LearningCombining Ontologies with Correspondences and Link Relations: The E-SHIQ Representation Framework
Combining knowledge and beliefs of autonomous peers in distributed settings, is a ma- jor challenge. In this paper we consider peers that combine ontologies and reason jointly with their coupled knowledge. Ontologies are…