A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating data across various modalities. By transforming data from a scarce resource into a controllable asset, LLMs mitigate the bottlenecks imposed by the acquisition costs of real-world data for model training, evaluation, and system iteration. However, ensuring the high quality of LLM-generated synthetic data remains a critical challenge. Existing research primarily focuses on generation methodologies, with limited direct attention to the quality of the resulting data. Furthermore, most studies are restricted to single modalities, lacking a unified perspective across different data types. To bridge this gap, we propose the \textbf{LLM Data Auditor framework}. In this framework, we first describe how LLMs are utilized to generate data across six distinct modalities. More importantly, we systematically categorize intrinsic metrics for evaluating synthetic data from two dimensions: quality and trustworthiness. This approach shifts the focus from extrinsic evaluation, which relies on downstream task performance, to the inherent properties of the data itself. Using this evaluation system, we analyze the experimental evaluations of representative generation methods for each modality and identify substantial deficiencies in current evaluation practices. Based on these findings, we offer concrete recommendations for the community to improve the evaluation of data generation. Finally, the framework outlines methodologies for the practical application of synthetic data across different modalities.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
DeepSurvey-Bench: Evaluating Academic Value of Automatically Generated Scientific Surveys
The rapid development of automated survey generation technology has made it increasingly important to establish a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the quality of generated surveys. Most existing benchmarks first const…
Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment
Ensuring alignment, which refers to making models behave in accordance with human intentions [1,2], has become a critical task before deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. For instance, OpenA…
FairnessModels AlignmentEvaluating Trustworthiness of Online News Publishers via Article Classification
The proliferation of low-quality online information in today's era has underscored the need for robust and automatic mechanisms to evaluate the trustworthiness of online news publishers. In this paper, we analyse the tru…
ArticlesClassificationMachine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methods
Machine generated text is increasingly difficult to distinguish from human authored text. Powerful open-source models are freely available, and user-friendly tools that democratize access to generative models are prolife…
Abuse DetectionFairnessSurveyText Detection+1LLM or Human? Perceptions of Trust and Information Quality in Research Summaries
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate and edit scientific abstracts, yet their integration into academic writing raises questions about trust, quality, and disclosure. Despite growing adoption, l…