paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions

2020-11-19 · Lijing Lin, Matthew Sperrin, David A. Jenkins, Glen P. Martin, Niels Peek

Background and Aims: The methods with which prediction models are usually developed mean that neither the parameters nor the predictions should be interpreted causally. However, when prediction models are used to support decision making, there is often a need for predicting outcomes under hypothetical interventions. We aimed to identify published methods for developing and validating prediction models that enable risk estimation of outcomes under hypothetical interventions, utilizing causal inference: their main methodological approaches, underlying assumptions, targeted estimands, and potential pitfalls and challenges with using the method, and unresolved methodological challenges. Methods: We systematically reviewed literature published by December 2019, considering papers in the health domain that used causal considerations to enable prediction models to be used for predictions under hypothetical interventions. Results: We identified 4919 papers through database searches and a further 115 papers through manual searches, of which 13 were selected for inclusion, from both the statistical and the machine learning literature. Most of the identified methods for causal inference from observational data were based on marginal structural models and g-estimation. Conclusions: There exist two broad methodological approaches for allowing prediction under hypothetical intervention into clinical prediction models: 1) enriching prediction models derived from observational studies with estimated causal effects from clinical trials and meta-analyses; and 2) estimating prediction models and causal effects directly from observational data. These methods require extending to dynamic treatment regimes, and consideration of multiple interventions to operationalise a clinical decision support system. Techniques for validating 'causal prediction models' are still in their infancy.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2011.09815

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Causal InferenceDecision MakingPrediction

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Causal inference Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a causal connection based on the conditions of the occurrence of an effect. The main difference between causal…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Scoping Review of Earth Observation and Machine Learning for Causal Inference: Implications for the Geography of Poverty

2024-05-30 · Kazuki Sakamoto, Connor T. Jerzak, Adel Daoud

Earth observation (EO) data such as satellite imagery can have far-reaching impacts on our understanding of the geography of poverty, especially when coupled with machine learning (ML) and computer vision. Early research…

Causal DiscoveryCausal InferenceEarth ObservationImputation+1

Electroencephalography and mild cognitive impairment research: A scoping review and bibliometric analysis (ScoRBA)

2022-11-01 · Adi Wijaya, Noor Akhmad Setiawan, Asma Hayati Ahmad, Rahimah Zakaria 외

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a precursor to Alzheimer's disease (AD) due to the high rate of progression from MCI to AD. Sensitive neural biomarkers may provide a tool for an accurate M…

ArticlesEEGElectroencephalogram (EEG)ERP

Scalable Causal Structure Learning: Scoping Review of Traditional and Deep Learning Algorithms and New Opportunities in Biomedicine

2021-10-15 · Pulakesh Upadhyaya, Kai Zhang, Can Li, Xiaoqian Jiang 외

Causal structure learning refers to a process of identifying causal structures from observational data, and it can have multiple applications in biomedicine and health care. This paper provides a practical review and tut…

BIG-bench Machine LearningCausal DiscoveryEpidemiology

Expediting data extraction using a large language model (LLM) and scoping review protocol: a methodological study within a complex scoping review

2025-07-09 · James Stewart-Evans, Emma Wilson, Tessa Langley, Andrew Prayle 외 arxiv

The data extraction stages of reviews are resource-intensive, and researchers may seek to expediate data extraction using online (large language models) LLMs and review protocols. Claude 3.5 Sonnet was used to trial two …

Prompt Engineering

Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

2023-11-24 · Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Fei Cheng, Beverley Anne Yamamoto

This scoping review explores the ethical challenges of using ChatGPT in higher education. By reviewing recent academic articles in English, Chinese, and Japanese, we aimed to provide a deep dive review and identify gaps …

ArticlesMisinformation