A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions
Background and Aims: The methods with which prediction models are usually developed mean that neither the parameters nor the predictions should be interpreted causally. However, when prediction models are used to support decision making, there is often a need for predicting outcomes under hypothetical interventions. We aimed to identify published methods for developing and validating prediction models that enable risk estimation of outcomes under hypothetical interventions, utilizing causal inference: their main methodological approaches, underlying assumptions, targeted estimands, and potential pitfalls and challenges with using the method, and unresolved methodological challenges. Methods: We systematically reviewed literature published by December 2019, considering papers in the health domain that used causal considerations to enable prediction models to be used for predictions under hypothetical interventions. Results: We identified 4919 papers through database searches and a further 115 papers through manual searches, of which 13 were selected for inclusion, from both the statistical and the machine learning literature. Most of the identified methods for causal inference from observational data were based on marginal structural models and g-estimation. Conclusions: There exist two broad methodological approaches for allowing prediction under hypothetical intervention into clinical prediction models: 1) enriching prediction models derived from observational studies with estimated causal effects from clinical trials and meta-analyses; and 2) estimating prediction models and causal effects directly from observational data. These methods require extending to dynamic treatment regimes, and consideration of multiple interventions to operationalise a clinical decision support system. Techniques for validating 'causal prediction models' are still in their infancy.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferenceDecision MakingPredictionMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Scoping Review of Earth Observation and Machine Learning for Causal Inference: Implications for the Geography of Poverty
Earth observation (EO) data such as satellite imagery can have far-reaching impacts on our understanding of the geography of poverty, especially when coupled with machine learning (ML) and computer vision. Early research…
Causal DiscoveryCausal InferenceEarth ObservationImputation+1Electroencephalography and mild cognitive impairment research: A scoping review and bibliometric analysis (ScoRBA)
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a precursor to Alzheimer's disease (AD) due to the high rate of progression from MCI to AD. Sensitive neural biomarkers may provide a tool for an accurate M…
ArticlesEEGElectroencephalogram (EEG)ERPScalable Causal Structure Learning: Scoping Review of Traditional and Deep Learning Algorithms and New Opportunities in Biomedicine
Causal structure learning refers to a process of identifying causal structures from observational data, and it can have multiple applications in biomedicine and health care. This paper provides a practical review and tut…
BIG-bench Machine LearningCausal DiscoveryEpidemiologyExpediting data extraction using a large language model (LLM) and scoping review protocol: a methodological study within a complex scoping review
The data extraction stages of reviews are resource-intensive, and researchers may seek to expediate data extraction using online (large language models) LLMs and review protocols. Claude 3.5 Sonnet was used to trial two …
Prompt EngineeringEthical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review
This scoping review explores the ethical challenges of using ChatGPT in higher education. By reviewing recent academic articles in English, Chinese, and Japanese, we aimed to provide a deep dive review and identify gaps …
ArticlesMisinformation