paper-with-me

Papers

A Tutorial for Weighted Bipolar Argumentation with Continuous Dynamical Systems and the Java Library Attractor

2018-11-30 · Nico Potyka

Weighted bipolar argumentation frameworks allow modeling decision problems and online discussions by defining arguments and their relationships. The strength of arguments can be computed based on an initial weight and the strength of attacking and supporting arguments. While previous approaches assumed an acyclic argumentation graph and successively set arguments' strength based on the strength of their parents, recently continuous dynamical systems have been proposed as an alternative. Continuous models update arguments' strength simultaneously and continuously. While there are currently no analytical guarantees for convergence in general graphs, experiments show that continuous models can converge quickly in large cyclic graphs with thousands of arguments. Here, we focus on the high-level ideas of this approach and explain key results and applications. We also introduce Attractor, a Java library that can be used to solve weighted bipolar argumentation problems. Attractor contains implementations of several discrete and continuous models and numerical algorithms to compute solutions. It also provides base classes that can be used to implement, to evaluate and to compare continuous models easily.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1811.12787

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

2016-11-25 · Till Mossakowski, Fabian Neuhaus

This paper discusses the semantics of weighted argumentation graphs that are biplor, i.e. contain both attacks and support graphs. The work builds on previous work by Amgoud, Ben-Naim et. al., which presents and compares…

Modular Semantics and Characteristics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

2018-07-17 · Till Mossakowski, Fabian Neuhaus

This paper addresses the semantics of weighted argumentation graphs that are bipolar, i.e. contain both attacks and supports for arguments. It builds on previous work by Amgoud, Ben-Naim et. al. We study the various char…

All

Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation

2019-03-05 · Amin Karamlou, Kristijonas Čyras, Francesca Toni

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of the support relation and diverging definitions of semantics. Recently, several classes of BAFs have been captured as instances of bipolar Assumptio…

Aggregating Bipolar Opinions (With Appendix)

2021-02-04 · Stefan Lauren, Francesco Belardinelli, Francesca Toni

We introduce a novel method to aggregate Bipolar Argumentation (BA) Frameworks expressing opinions by different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for…

Extending Modular Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation (Technical Report)

2018-09-19 · Nico Potyka

Weighted bipolar argumentation frameworks offer a tool for decision support and social media analysis. Arguments are evaluated by an iterative procedure that takes initial weights and attack and support relations into ac…