paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences

2016-10-10 · Kristijonas Čyras, Francesca Toni

We present ABA+, a new approach to handling preferences in a well known structured argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA). In ABA+, preference information given over assumptions is incorporated directly into the attack relation, thus resulting in attack reversal. ABA+ conservatively extends ABA and exhibits various desirable features regarding relationship among argumentation semantics as well as preference handling. We also introduce Weak Contraposition, a principle concerning reasoning with rules and preferences that relaxes the standard principle of contraposition, while guaranteeing additional desirable features for ABA+.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1610.03024

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Preference Elicitation in Assumption-Based Argumentation

2020-05-12 · Quratul-ain Mahesar, Nir Oren, Wamberto W. Vasconcelos

Various structured argumentation frameworks utilize preferences as part of their standard inference procedure to enable reasoning with preferences. In this paper, we consider an inverse of the standard reasoning problem,…

A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences

2018-04-18 · Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken

This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumentation with preferences. We motivate a revised definition of conflict free sets of arguments, adapt ASPIC+ to accommodate a broa…

Assumption-Based Approaches to Reasoning with Priorities

2017-09-21 · Jesse Heyninck, Christian Straßer, Pere Pardo

This paper maps out the relation between different approaches for handling preferences in argumentation with strict rules and defeasible assumptions by offering translations between them. The systems we compare are: non-…

Relation

An Extension-based Approach for Computing and Verifying Preferences in Abstract Argumentation

2024-03-26 · Quratul-ain Mahesar, Nir Oren, Wamberto W. Vasconcelos

We present an extension-based approach for computing and verifying preferences in an abstract argumentation system. Although numerous argumentation semantics have been developed previously for identifying acceptable sets…

Abstract Argumentation

Resolving Conflicts in Clinical Guidelines using Argumentation

2019-02-20 · Kristijonas Čyras, Tiago Oliveira

Automatically reasoning with conflicting generic clinical guidelines is a burning issue in patient-centric medical reasoning where patient-specific conditions and goals need to be taken into account. It is even more chal…