paper-with-me

Papers

Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems

2025-09-12 · Alva West, Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Zhen Lin, Zhiyuan Ning, Yue Zhang arxiv

Failure attribution in multi-agent systems -- pinpointing the exact step where a decisive error occurs -- is a critical yet unsolved challenge. Current methods treat this as a pattern recognition task over long conversation logs, leading to critically low step-level accuracy (below 17\%), which renders them impractical for debugging complex systems. Their core weakness is a fundamental inability to perform robust counterfactual reasoning: to determine if correcting a single action would have actually averted the task failure. To bridge this \emph{counterfactual inference gap}, we introduce Abduct-Act-Predict (A2P) Scaffolding, a novel agent framework that transforms failure attribution from pattern recognition into a structured causal inference task. A2P explicitly guides a large language model through a formal three-step reasoning process within a single inference pass: (1) Abduction, to infer the hidden root causes behind an agent's actions; (2) Action, to define a minimal corrective intervention; and (3) Prediction, to simulate the subsequent trajectory and verify if the intervention resolves the failure. This structured approach leverages the holistic context of the entire conversation while imposing a rigorous causal logic on the model's analysis. Our extensive experiments on the Who\&When benchmark demonstrate its efficacy. On the Algorithm-Generated dataset, A2P achieves 47.46\% step-level accuracy, a 2.85$\times$ improvement over the 16.67\% of the baseline. On the more complex Hand-Crafted dataset, it achieves 29.31\% step accuracy, a 2.43$\times$ improvement over the baseline's 12.07\%. By reframing the problem through a causal lens, A2P Scaffolding provides a robust, verifiable, and significantly more accurate solution for automated failure attribution. Ours code are released at https://github.com/ResearAI/A2P.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2509.10401

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Causal Inference

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Automated hypothesis generation via Evolutionary Abduction

2021-09-29 · Roberto Pietrantuono

Abduction is a powerful form of causal inference employed in many artificial intelligence tasks, such as medical diagnosis, criminology, root cause analysis, intent recognition. Given an effect, the abductive reasoning a…

Causal InferenceIntent RecognitionMedical Diagnosis

Abduction-Deduction Entanglement: Domain Generalization via Representation Transplants

2026-05-24 · Kasra Jalaldoust, Elias Bareinboum arxiv

Prediction models trained under the source distribution do not generalize well to a different target distribution. A valid inference about an unseen data distribution must be anchored by the invariance of certain causal …

Domain Generalization

Image Quality Assessment: Investigating Causal Perceptual Effects with Abductive Counterfactual Inference

2024-12-22 · CVPR 2025 1 · Wenhao Shen, Mingliang Zhou, Yu Chen, Xuekai Wei 외

Existing full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) methods often fail to capture the complex causal mechanisms that underlie human perceptual responses to image distortions, limiting their ability to generalize ac…

counterfactualCounterfactual InferenceFull reference image quality assessmentFull-Reference Image Quality Assessment+1

Generating Hypothetical Events for Abductive Inference

2021-06-07 · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics 2021 · Debjit Paul, Anette Frank

Abductive reasoning starts from some observations and aims at finding the most plausible explanation for these observations. To perform abduction, humans often make use of temporal and causal inferences, and knowledge ab…

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

How Rules Represent Causal Knowledge: Causal Modeling with Abductive Logic Programs

2025-07-07 · Kilian Rückschloß, Felix Weitkämper arxiv

Pearl observes that causal knowledge enables predicting the effects of interventions, such as actions, whereas descriptive knowledge only permits drawing conclusions from observation. This paper extends Pearl's approach …