paper-with-me

Papers

Access Timing as Scaffolding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to GenAI in Education

2026-05-15 · Janne Rotter, Pau Benazet i Montobbio, Davinia Hernández-Leo arxiv

In recent years, generative AI (GenAI) in educational settings has become ubiquitous in university students' daily lives, despite its potential to induce over-reliance, metacognitive disengagement, and diminished learning when used unrestrictedly. While most prior research has focused on how to pedagogically scaffold its usage, the question of when to allow off-the-shelf GenAI remains understudied and lacks pedagogically grounded empirical investigation. We treat access timing itself as a form of implicit scaffolding and operationalize it through a reinforcement learning (RL) agent that decides when students should access GenAI, with a reward function grounded in metacognitive theory, cognitive load theory, and productive failure. In a mixed-methods controlled lab study with N=105 higher education students, we compared the agent's effect on learning gains and metacognitive engagement to unrestricted and fully restricted use. Results show that strategically timed GenAI access under the reinforcement learning condition improved objective post-test performance and metacognitive accuracy compared with unrestricted access, while reducing task errors and time on task relative to complete withholding, thus outperforming both approaches without the need for explicit metacognitive prompts or structured scaffolding. However, no between-condition differences emerged on self-reported metacognitive awareness. Overall, timing of GenAI access therefore is a tractable, theoretically grounded, and scalable pedagogical strategy that improves over completely unrestricted and withheld access, compatible with off-the-shelf tools and potentially low adoption barrier. This opens up a new research area that explores how access timing can be facilitated by educators and implemented in human-AI learning system design.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.15850

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Generative AI and the Productivity Divide: Human-AI Complementarities in Education

2026-05-18 · Lihi Idan, Bharat Anand arxiv

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming how firms create, process, and apply knowledge, yet little is known about the heterogeneity of its productivity effects across users. We report results from a ra…

Exploring Student Perception on Gen AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Descriptive Study

2026-03-29 · Harpreet Singh, Jaspreet Singh, Satwant Singh, Rupinder Singh 외 arxiv

The rapid proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping pedagogical practices and assessment models in higher education. While institutional and educator perspectives on GenAI integration are i…

Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

2024-11-01 · Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins

This scoping review examines the relationship between Generative AI (GenAI) and agency in education, analyzing the literature available through the lens of Critical Digital Pedagogy. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we c…

Generative AI and Digital Neocolonialism in Global Education: Towards an Equitable Framework

2024-06-05 · Matthew Nyaaba, Alyson Wright, Gyu Lim Choi

This paper critically discusses how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) might impose Western ideologies on non-Western societies, perpetuating digital neocolonialism in education through its inherent biases. It fu…

Evaluating the AI-Lab Intervention: Impact on Student Perception and Use of Generative AI in Early Undergraduate Computer Science Courses

2025-04-30 · Ethan Dickey, Andres Bejarano, Rhianna Kuperus, Bárbara Fagundes

Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly entering computer science education, yet its effects on student learning, skill development, and perceptions remain underexplored. Concerns about overreliance coexist with a gap in resear…