Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?
Previous generations of face recognition algorithms differ in accuracy for images of different races (race bias). Here, we present the possible underlying factors (data-driven and scenario modeling) and methodological considerations for assessing race bias in algorithms. We discuss data driven factors (e.g., image quality, image population statistics, and algorithm architecture), and scenario modeling factors that consider the role of the "user" of the algorithm (e.g., threshold decisions and demographic constraints). To illustrate how these issues apply, we present data from four face recognition algorithms (a previous-generation algorithm and three deep convolutional neural networks, DCNNs) for East Asian and Caucasian faces. First, dataset difficulty affected both overall recognition accuracy and race bias, such that race bias increased with item difficulty. Second, for all four algorithms, the degree of bias varied depending on the identification decision threshold. To achieve equal false accept rates (FARs), East Asian faces required higher identification thresholds than Caucasian faces, for all algorithms. Third, demographic constraints on the formulation of the distributions used in the test, impacted estimates of algorithm accuracy. We conclude that race bias needs to be measured for individual applications and we provide a checklist for measuring this bias in face recognition algorithms.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Face RecognitionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
An Enhancement of Haar Cascade Algorithm Applied to Face Recognition for Gate Pass Security
This study is focused on enhancing the Haar Cascade Algorithm to decrease the false positive and false negative rate in face matching and face detection to increase the accuracy rate even under challenging conditions. Th…
Face DetectionFace RecognitionHuman-Machine Comparison for Cross-Race Face Verification: Race Bias at the Upper Limits of Performance?
Face recognition algorithms perform more accurately than humans in some cases, though humans and machines both show race-based accuracy differences. As algorithms continue to improve, it is important to continually asses…
Face RecognitionFace VerificationAccuracy and Performance Comparison of Video Action Recognition Approaches
Over the past few years, there has been significant interest in video action recognition systems and models. However, direct comparison of accuracy and computational performance results remain clouded by differing traini…
Action RecognitionTemporal Action LocalizationFace Recognition as a Method of Authentication in a Web-Based System
Online information systems currently heavily rely on the username and password traditional method for protecting information and controlling access. With the advancement in biometric technology and popularity of fields l…
BIG-bench Machine LearningFace RecognitionGeneral ClassificationPushing the Frontiers of Unconstrained Face Detection and Recognition: IARPA Janus Benchmark A
Rapid progress in unconstrained face recognition has resulted in a saturation in recognition accuracy for current benchmark datasets. While important for early progress, a chief limitation in most benchmark datasets is t…
BenchmarkingFace DetectionFace RecognitionRobust Face Recognition