paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy-Constrained ERM

2017-05-30 · Katrina Ligett, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Bo Waggoner, Z. Steven Wu

Traditional approaches to differential privacy assume a fixed privacy requirement $\epsilon$ for a computation, and attempt to maximize the accuracy of the computation subject to the privacy constraint. As differential privacy is increasingly deployed in practical settings, it may often be that there is instead a fixed accuracy requirement for a given computation and the data analyst would like to maximize the privacy of the computation subject to the accuracy constraint. This raises the question of how to find and run a maximally private empirical risk minimizer subject to a given accuracy requirement. We propose a general "noise reduction" framework that can apply to a variety of private empirical risk minimization (ERM) algorithms, using them to "search" the space of privacy levels to find the empirically strongest one that meets the accuracy constraint, incurring only logarithmic overhead in the number of privacy levels searched. The privacy analysis of our algorithm leads naturally to a version of differential privacy where the privacy parameters are dependent on the data, which we term ex-post privacy, and which is related to the recently introduced notion of privacy odometers. We also give an ex-post privacy analysis of the classical AboveThreshold privacy tool, modifying it to allow for queries chosen depending on the database. Finally, we apply our approach to two common objectives, regularized linear and logistic regression, and empirically compare our noise reduction methods to (i) inverting the theoretical utility guarantees of standard private ERM algorithms and (ii) a stronger, empirical baseline based on binary search.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1705.10829

Code (1)

steven7woo/Accuracy-First-Differential-Privacy

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy Constrained ERM

2017-12-01 · NeurIPS 2017 12 · Katrina Ligett, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Bo Waggoner 외

Traditional approaches to differential privacy assume a fixed privacy requirement ε for a computation, and attempt to maximize the accuracy of the computation subject to the privacy constraint. As differential privacy is…

An Interactive Framework for Finding the Optimal Trade-off in Differential Privacy

2025-09-04 · Yaohong Yang, Aki Rehn, Sammie Katt, Antti Honkela 외 arxiv

Differential privacy (DP) is the standard for privacy-preserving analysis, and introduces a fundamental trade-off between privacy guarantees and model performance. Selecting the optimal balance is a critical challenge th…

Transfer Learning

Fine-Tuning with Differential Privacy Necessitates an Additional Hyperparameter Search

2022-10-05 · Yannis Cattan, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Nicolas Papernot, Abhradeep Thakurta

Models need to be trained with privacy-preserving learning algorithms to prevent leakage of possibly sensitive information contained in their training data. However, canonical algorithms like differentially private stoch…

Privacy Preserving

Differential Privacy Meets Neural Network Pruning

2023-03-08 · Kamil Adamczewski, Mijung Park

A major challenge in applying differential privacy to training deep neural network models is scalability.The widely-used training algorithm, differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), struggles with tra…

Dimensionality ReductionNetwork Pruning

Limits of Personalizing Differential Privacy Budgets

2026-05-13 · Edwige Cyffers, Juba Ziani arxiv

A key technical difficulty in differential privacy is selecting a privacy budget that satisfies privacy requirements while maximizing utility. A natural and well-studied workaround is to use personalized privacy budgets,…