paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boosting

2019-09-17 · Vasileios Iosifidis, Eirini Ntoutsi

The widespread use of ML-based decision making in domains with high societal impact such as recidivism, job hiring and loan credit has raised a lot of concerns regarding potential discrimination. In particular, in certain cases it has been observed that ML algorithms can provide different decisions based on sensitive attributes such as gender or race and therefore can lead to discrimination. Although, several fairness-aware ML approaches have been proposed, their focus has been largely on preserving the overall classification accuracy while improving fairness in predictions for both protected and non-protected groups (defined based on the sensitive attribute(s)). The overall accuracy however is not a good indicator of performance in case of class imbalance, as it is biased towards the majority class. As we will see in our experiments, many of the fairness-related datasets suffer from class imbalance and therefore, tackling fairness requires also tackling the imbalance problem. To this end, we propose AdaFair, a fairness-aware classifier based on AdaBoost that further updates the weights of the instances in each boosting round taking into account a cumulative notion of fairness based upon all current ensemble members, while explicitly tackling class-imbalance by optimizing the number of ensemble members for balanced classification error. Our experiments show that our approach can achieve parity in true positive and true negative rates for both protected and non-protected groups, while it significantly outperforms existing fairness-aware methods up to 25% in terms of balanced error.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1909.08982

Code (1)

iosifidisvasileios/AdaFair 공식 구현

Tasks

AttributeDecision MakingFairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Parity-based Cumulative Fairness-aware Boosting

2022-01-04 · Vasileios Iosifidis, Arjun Roy, Eirini Ntoutsi

Data-driven AI systems can lead to discrimination on the basis of protected attributes like gender or race. One reason for this behavior is the encoded societal biases in the training data (e.g., females are underreprese…

Fairness

AdaFair-MARL: Enforcing Adaptive Fairness Constraints in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

2025-11-18 · Promise Ekpo, Saesha Agarwal, Felix Grimm, Lekan Molu 외 arxiv

Fair workload enforcement in heterogeneous multi-agent systems that pursue shared objectives remains challenging. Fixed fairness penalties often introduce inefficiencies, training instability, and conflicting agent incen…

Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Fair MP-BOOST: Fair and Interpretable Minipatch Boosting

2024-04-01 · Camille Olivia Little, Genevera I. Allen

Ensemble methods, particularly boosting, have established themselves as highly effective and widely embraced machine learning techniques for tabular data. In this paper, we aim to leverage the robust predictive power of …

FairnessFeature Importance

FeDABoost: Fairness Aware Federated Learning with Adaptive Boosting

2025-10-03 · Tharuka Kasthuri Arachchige, Veselka Boeva, Shahrooz Abghari arxiv

This work focuses on improving the performance and fairness of Federated Learning (FL) in non IID settings by enhancing model aggregation and boosting the training of underperforming clients. We propose FeDABoost, a nove…

Federated Learning

A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracy

2016-01-21 · Benjamin Fish, Jeremy Kun, Ádám D. Lelkes

We study three classical machine learning algorithms in the context of algorithmic fairness: adaptive boosting, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Our goal is to maintain the high accuracy of these learnin…

Fairness