paper-with-me

Papers

Adaptive and Robust Cost-Aware Proof of Quality for Decentralized LLM Inference Networks

2026-01-29 · Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Frank Chen, Simon Wu, Aaron Chan arxiv

Decentralized large language model inference networks require lightweight mechanisms to reward high quality outputs under heterogeneous latency and cost. Proof of Quality provides scalable verification by sampling evaluator nodes that score candidate outputs, then aggregating their scores into a consensus signal that determines rewards. However, evaluator heterogeneity and malicious score manipulation can distort consensus and inflate payouts, which weakens incentive alignment in open participation settings. This paper extends a cost-aware Proof of Quality mechanism by adding adversary-resilient consensus formation. We study robust aggregation rules, including median and trimmed mean, and an adaptive trust-weighted consensus that updates evaluator weights from deviation signals. Using question answering and summarization workloads with a ground truth proxy for offline analysis, we quantify evaluator reliability and show strong variance across evaluators, including task-dependent misalignment that can invert correlations. We then evaluate robustness under four adversarial strategies, including noise injection, boosting, sabotage, and intermittent manipulation, across a sweep of malicious ratios and evaluator sample sizes. Our results show that robust aggregation improves consensus alignment with the ground truth proxy and reduces sensitivity to noisy and strategic attacks compared with simple averaging. We further characterize the operational trade-off introduced by evaluator sampling, where larger evaluator sets reduce evaluator rewards and increase payoff variance while inference rewards remain relatively stable in our configuration. These findings motivate robust consensus as a default component for cost-aware Proof of Quality and provide practical guidance for selecting evaluator sampling parameters under adversarial risk and resource constraints.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.21189

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring Framework for Decentralized LLM Inference with Proof of Quality

2026-03-04 · Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Frank Chen, Simon Wu 외 arxiv

Decentralized large language model (LLM) inference networks can pool heterogeneous compute to scale serving, but they require lightweight and incentive-compatible mechanisms to assess output quality. Prior work introduce…

PoQ-Judge: A Multi-Architecture Evaluation Framework for Cost-Aware Proof-of-Quality in Decentralized LLM Inference

2026-04-20 · Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Frank Chen, Simon Wu 외 arxiv

Decentralized LLM inference networks need lightweight, reference-free quality evaluation for Proof of Quality (PoQ). We present PoQ-Judge, a framework that trains dedicated judge models to score query-output pairs withou…

Design and Evaluation of Cost-Aware PoQ for Decentralized LLM Inference

2025-12-18 · Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Frank Chen, Alan Wu 외 arxiv

Decentralized large language model (LLM) inference promises transparent and censorship resistant access to advanced AI, yet existing verification approaches struggle to scale to modern models. Proof of Quality (PoQ) repl…

Semantic Textual SimilarityQuestion Answering

AutoDFL: A Scalable and Automated Reputation-Aware Decentralized Federated Learning

2025-01-08 · Meryem Malak Dif, Mouhamed Amine Bouchiha, Mourad Rabah, Yacine Ghamri-Doudane

Blockchained federated learning (BFL) combines the concepts of federated learning and blockchain technology to enhance privacy, security, and transparency in collaborative machine learning models. However, implementing B…

Federated Learning

A Decentralized Retrieval Augmented Generation System with Source Reliabilities Secured on Blockchain

2025-11-10 · Yining Lu, Wenyi Tang, Max Johnson, Taeho Jung 외 arxiv

Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems typically use a centralized architecture, causing a high cost of data collection, integration, and management, as well as privacy concerns. There is a great need for …