paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Adaptive Testing for LLM Evaluation: A Psychometric Alternative to Static Benchmarks

2025-10-26 · Peiyu Li, Xiuxiu Tang, Si Chen, Ying Cheng, Ronald Metoyer, Ting Hua, Nitesh V. Chawla arxiv

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) typically requires thousands of benchmark items, making the process expensive, slow, and increasingly impractical at scale. Existing evaluation protocols rely on average accuracy over fixed item sets, treating all items as equally informative despite substantial variation in difficulty and discrimination. We introduce ATLAS, an adaptive testing framework based on Item Response Theory (IRT) that estimates model ability using Fisher information-guided item selection. ATLAS reduces the number of required items by up to 90% while maintaining measurement precision. For instance, it matches whole-bank ability estimates using only 41 items (0.157 MAE) on HellaSwag (5,600 items). We further reconstruct accuracy from ATLAS's ability estimates and find that reconstructed accuracies closely match raw accuracies across all five benchmarks, indicating that ability $θ$ preserves the global performance structure. At the same time, $θ$ provides finer discrimination within accuracy-equivalent models: among more than 3,000 evaluated models, 23-31% shift by more than 10 rank positions, and models with identical accuracies receive meaningfully different ability estimates. Code and calibrated item banks are available at https://github.com/Peiyu-Georgia-Li/ATLAS.git.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.04689

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans

2023-06-18 · Yan Zhuang, Qi Liu, Zachary A. Pardos, Patrick C. Kyllonen 외

As AI systems continue to evolve, their rigorous evaluation becomes crucial for their development and deployment. Researchers have constructed various large-scale benchmarks to determine their capabilities, typically aga…

Mathematical ReasoningPosition

Leveraging Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cost-effective Evaluation of Large Language Models in Medical Benchmarking

2026-02-28 · Tianpeng Zheng, Zhehan Jiang, Jiayi Liu, Shicong Feng arxiv

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare creates an urgent need for scalable and psychometrically sound evaluation methods. Conventional static benchmarks are costly to administer repeatedly,…

Survey of Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Machine Learning Perspective

2024-03-31 · Qi Liu, Yan Zhuang, Haoyang Bi, Zhenya Huang 외

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) provides an efficient and tailored method for assessing the proficiency of examinees, by dynamically adjusting test questions based on their performance. Widely adopted across diverse …

cognitive diagnosisQuestion SelectionSociologySurvey

Do Psychometric Tests Work for Large Language Models? Evaluation of Tests on Sexism, Racism, and Morality

2025-10-13 · Jana Jung, Marlene Lutz, Indira Sen, Markus Strohmaier arxiv

Psychometric tests are increasingly used to assess psychological constructs in large language models (LLMs). However, it remains unclear whether these tests -- originally developed for humans -- yield meaningful results …

Fluid Language Model Benchmarking

2025-09-14 · Valentin Hofmann, David Heineman, Ian Magnusson, Kyle Lo 외 arxiv

Language model (LM) benchmarking faces several challenges: comprehensive evaluations are costly, benchmarks often fail to measure the intended capabilities, and evaluation quality can degrade due to labeling errors and b…