paper-with-me

Papers

Agenda Separability in Judgment Aggregation

2016-04-22 · Jérôme Lang, Marija Slavkovik, Srdjan Vesic

One of the better studied properties for operators in judgment aggregation is independence, which essentially dictates that the collective judgment on one issue should not depend on the individual judgments given on some other issue(s) in the same agenda. Independence, although considered a desirable property, is too strong, because together with mild additional conditions it implies dictatorship. We propose here a weakening of independence, named agenda separability: a judgment aggregation rule satisfies it if, whenever the agenda is composed of several independent sub-agendas, the resulting collective judgment sets can be computed separately for each sub-agenda and then put together. We show that this property is discriminant, in the sense that among judgment aggregation rules so far studied in the literature, some satisfy it and some do not. We briefly discuss the implications of agenda separability on the computation of judgment aggregation rules.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1604.06614

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Aggregating Credences into Beliefs: Agenda Conditions for Impossibility Results

2023-07-11 · Minkyung Wang, Chisu Kim

Binarizing belief aggregation addresses how to rationally aggregate individual probabilistic beliefs into collective binary beliefs. Similar to the development of judgment aggregation theory, formulating axiomatic requir…

BinarizationNegation

Consensus in Motion: A Case of Dynamic Rationality of Sequential Learning in Probability Aggregation

2025-04-20 · Polina Gordienko, Christoph Jansen, Thomas Augustin, Martin Rechenauer

We propose a framework for probability aggregation based on propositional probability logic. Unlike conventional judgment aggregation, which focuses on static rationality, our model addresses dynamic rationality by ensur…

Decision MakingSequential Decision Making

Judgment Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation

2014-05-26 · Edmond Awad, Richard Booth, Fernando Tohme, Iyad Rahwan

Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which arguments should be accepted, rejected, or deemed undecided. We study the problem of how multiple such judgments can be aggreg…

Agenda manipulation-proofness, stalemates, and redundant elicitation in preference aggregation. Exposing the bright side of Arrow's theorem

2022-10-06 · Stefano Vannucci

This paper provides a general framework to explore the possibility of agenda manipulation-proof and proper consensus-based preference aggregation rules, so powerfully called in doubt by a disputable if widely shared unde…

Aggregating Probabilistic Judgments

2019-07-22 · Magdalena Ivanovska, Marija Slavkovik

In this paper we explore the application of methods for classical judgment aggregation in pooling probabilistic opinions on logically related issues. For this reason, we first modify the Boolean judgment aggregation fram…