paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

AgentEval: DAG-Structured Step-Level Evaluation for Agentic Workflows with Error Propagation Tracking

2026-04-26 · Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu arxiv

Agentic systems that chain reasoning, tool use, and synthesis into multi-step workflows are entering production, yet prevailing evaluation practices like end-to-end outcome checks and ad-hoc trace inspection systematically mask the intermediate failures that dominate real-world error budgets. We present AgentEval, a framework that formalizes agent executions as evaluation directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where each node carries typed quality metrics assessed by a calibrated LLM judge (GPT-4o), classified through a hierarchical failure taxonomy (3 levels, 21 subcategories), and linked to upstream dependencies for automated root cause attribution. An ablation study isolates the impact of DAG-based dependency modeling: it alone contributes +22 percentage points to failure detection recall and +34 pp to root cause accuracy over flat step-level evaluation with identical judges and rubrics. Across three production workflows (450 test cases, two agent model families, predominantly sequential architectures with a 12% non-DAG trace rate), AgentEval achieves 2.17x higher failure detection recall than end-to-end evaluation (0.89 vs. 0.41), Cohen's kappa = 0.84 agreement with human experts, and 72% root cause accuracy against an 81% human ceiling. Cross-system evaluation on tau-bench and SWE-bench traces confirms transferability (failure detection recall >= 0.78) without taxonomy or rubric modification. A 4-month pilot with 18 engineers detected 23 pre-release regressions through CI/CD-integrated regression testing, reducing median root-cause identification time from 4.2 hours to 22 minutes and driving measurable failure rate reductions in two workflows.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2604.23581

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Evaluating Cognitive Age Alignment in Interactive AI Agents

2026-05-18 · Yifan Shen, Jiawen Zhang, Jian Xu, Junho Kim 외 arxiv

While agentic AI and its core multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable promise in language and visual reasoning across domains ranging from daily life to advanced scientific research, a profo…

Visual Reasoning

Agentic Reasoning: Reasoning LLMs with Tools for the Deep Research

2025-02-07 · Junde Wu, Jiayuan Zhu, Yuyuan Liu

We introduce Agentic Reasoning, a framework that enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by integrating external tool-using agents. Unlike conventional LLM-based reasoning approaches, which rely solely on internal …

Decision MakingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model+3

VoiceAgentEval: A Dual-Dimensional Benchmark for Expert-Level Intelligent Voice-Agent Evaluation of Xbench's Professional-Aligned Series

2025-10-24 · Pengyu Xu, Shijia Li, Ao Sun, Feng Zhang 외 arxiv

We propose OutboundEval, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in expert-level intelligent outbound calling scenarios. Unlike existing methods that suffer from three key limitations - insu…

Large Language Model Critics for Execution-Free Evaluation of Code Changes

2025-01-28 · Aashish Yadavally, Hoan Nguyen, Laurent Callot, Gauthier Guinet

Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising way forward for automating software engineering tasks, such as bug fixes, feature additions, etc., via multi-step LLM-based agentic workflows. However, existing metrics for …

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model

Agentic Planning with Reasoning for Image Styling via Offline RL

2026-03-07 · Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Stefano Petrangeli, Branislav Kveton, Trung Bui 외 arxiv

Direct prompt-based editing often fails on complex transformations because vague and subjective prompts often require nuanced understanding of what should be changed in the image. Our core intuition is that leveraging co…

Synthetic Data GenerationInstruction FollowingImage EditingOffline RL