paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Agentic Abstention: Do Agents Know When to Stop Instead of Act?

2026-06-27 · Han Luo, Bingbing Wen, Lucy Lu Wang arxiv

LLM agents are expected to act over multiple turns, using search, browsing interfaces, and terminal tools to complete user goals. Yet not every goal is well specified or achievable in the available environment. In such cases, a reliable agent should recognize that further interaction is unlikely to help and abstain from additional tool calls. We define Agentic Abstention, the problem of deciding when an agent should stop acting under uncertainty. Unlike standard LLM abstention, which is usually evaluated as a single-turn answer-or-abstain decision, agentic abstention is a sequential decision problem: an agent can answer, abstain, or gather more information at each turn, and the need to abstain may only become clear after interacting with the environment. We study this problem across web shopping, terminal environments, and question answering, evaluating 13 LLM-as-agent systems and 2 agent scaffolds on more than 28,000 tasks. Our results show that the main challenge is not only whether agents can abstain, but also when they abstain. Some agents never abstain when they should, while others do so only after many unnecessary interactions. This gap is especially large on tasks where the instruction appears feasible until the environment reveals otherwise (e.g., no valid result matches the instruction). We further find that model scale, reasoning, and agent scaffolding affect abstention in different ways, where larger or more capable models sometimes perform worse at timely abstention. Finally, we introduce CONVOLVE, a context engineering method for improving agentic abstention that distills full interaction trajectories into reusable stopping rules. On WebShop, CONVOLVE substantially improves timely abstention without updating model parameters, raising Llama-3.3-70B's timely recall rate from 26.7 to 57.4. Our dataset and code are available at https://lhannnn.github.io/agentic-abstention

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.28733

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

OpenBioRQ: Unsolved Biomedical Research Questions for Agents

2026-06-20 · Minbyul Jeong arxiv

A working citation looks like proof -- but the fact that a link resolves does not mean the cited paper supports the claim. I find that current agentic models rarely fabricate citations (over $99\%$ resolve), yet roughly …

Knowing When to Abstain: Medical LLMs Under Clinical Uncertainty

2026-01-18 · Sravanthi Machcha, Sushrita Yerra, Sahil Gupta, Aishwarya Sahoo 외 arxiv

Current evaluation of large language models (LLMs) overwhelmingly prioritizes accuracy; however, in real-world and safety-critical applications, the ability to abstain when uncertain is equally vital for trustworthy depl…

Question Answering

When Robots Should Say "I Don't Know": Benchmarking Abstention in Embodied Question Answering

2025-12-04 · Tao Wu, Chuhao Zhou, Guangyu Zhao, Haozhi Cao 외 arxiv

Embodied Question Answering (EQA) requires an agent to interpret language, perceive its environment, and navigate within 3D scenes to produce responses. Existing EQA benchmarks assume that every question must be answered…

Question Answering

When In Doubt, Abstain: The Impact of Abstention on Strategic Classification

2025-10-15 · Lina Alkarmi, Ziyuan Huang, Mingyan Liu arxiv

Algorithmic decision making is increasingly prevalent, but often vulnerable to strategic manipulation by agents seeking a favorable outcome. Prior research has shown that classifier abstention (allowing a classifier to d…

Decision Making

Auditable Early Stopping for Agentic Routing: Ledger-Verified Run-Wise Certificates under Local DP

2025-09-09 · Shivam Akhauri arxiv

We address when a best-first router for tool-use agents can stop exploring without missing a better leaf, while preserving local differential privacy (LDP) and leaving an audit trail. We introduce a run-wise certificate …