paper-with-me

Papers

Agentic LLM Planning via Step-Wise PDDL Simulation: An Empirical Characterisation

2026-03-06 · Kai Göbel, Pierrick Lorang, Patrik Zips, Tobias Glück arxiv

Task planning, the problem of sequencing actions to reach a goal from an initial state, is a core capability requirement for autonomous robotic systems. Whether large language models (LLMs) can serve as viable planners alongside classical symbolic methods remains an open question. We present PyPDDLEngine, an open-source Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) simulation engine that exposes planning operations as LLM tool calls through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface. Rather than committing to a complete action sequence upfront, the LLM acts as an interactive search policy that selects one action at a time, observes each resulting state, and can reset and retry. We evaluate four approaches on 102 International Planning Competition (IPC) Blocksworld instances under a uniform 180-second budget: Fast Downward lama-first and seq-sat-lama-2011 as classical baselines, direct LLM planning (Claude Haiku 4.5), and agentic LLM planning via PyPDDLEngine. Fast Downward achieves 85.3% success. The direct and agentic LLM approaches achieve 63.7% and 66.7%, respectively, a consistent but modest three-percentage-point advantage for the agentic approach at $5.7\times$ higher token cost per solution. Across most co-solved difficulty blocks, both LLM approaches produce shorter plans than seq-sat-lama-2011 despite its iterative quality improvement, a result consistent with training-data recall rather than generalisable planning. These results suggest that agentic gains depend on the nature of environmental feedback. Coding agents benefit from externally grounded signals such as compiler errors and test failures, whereas PDDL step feedback is self-assessed, leaving the agent to evaluate its own progress without external verification.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.06064

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

PDDLCoder: Agentic PDDL Generation for LLM-Assisted Symbolic Planning

2026-08-17 · Veit Laule, Jiangtao Shuai, Manfred Hauswirth, Sonja Schimmler arxiv

LLMs remain unreliable for long-horizon planning, often generating logically inconsistent or non-applicable plans. Recent hybrid methods instead translate natural language into the Planning Domain Definition Language (PD…

Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning

2023-11-16 · Katharina Stein, Daniel Fišer, Jörg Hoffmann, Alexander Koller

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized a large variety of NLP tasks. An active debate is to what extent they can do reasoning and planning. Prior work has assessed the latter in the specific context of PDDL pla…

Training the Orchestrator: A Supervised Approach to End-to-End PDDL Planning with LLM Agents

2026-06-19 · Rajesh Mangannavar, Zachary Coalson, Pranay Dugar, Prasad Tadepalli arxiv

Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks b…

Simulation to Rules: A Dual-VLM Framework for Formal Visual Planning

2025-10-03 · Yilun Hao, Yongchao Chen, Chuchu Fan, Yang Zhang arxiv

Vision Language Models (VLMs) show strong potential for visual planning but struggle with precise spatial and long-horizon reasoning, while Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) planners excel at formal long-horizon…

TwoStep: Multi-agent Task Planning using Classical Planners and Large Language Models

2024-03-25 · David Bai, Ishika Singh, David Traum, Jesse Thomason

Classical planning formulations like the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) admit action sequences guaranteed to achieve a goal state given an initial state if any are possible. However, reasoning problems define…

Task Planning