paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices

2023-04-07 · Alessandro Achille, Michael Kearns, Carson Klingenberg, Stefano Soatto

Responsible use of data is an indispensable part of any machine learning (ML) implementation. ML developers must carefully collect and curate their datasets, and document their provenance. They must also make sure to respect intellectual property rights, preserve individual privacy, and use data in an ethical way. Over the past few years, ML models have significantly increased in size and complexity. These models require a very large amount of data and compute capacity to train, to the extent that any defects in the training corpus cannot be trivially remedied by retraining the model from scratch. Despite sophisticated controls on training data and a significant amount of effort dedicated to ensuring that training corpora are properly composed, the sheer volume of data required for the models makes it challenging to manually inspect each datum comprising a training corpus. One potential fix for training corpus data defects is model disgorgement -- the elimination of not just the improperly used data, but also the effects of improperly used data on any component of an ML model. Model disgorgement techniques can be used to address a wide range of issues, such as reducing bias or toxicity, increasing fidelity, and ensuring responsible usage of intellectual property. In this paper, we introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern ML systems. In particular, we investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2304.03545

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

model

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Position: No Retroactive Cure for Infringement during Training

2026-04-20 · Satoru Utsunomiya, Masaru Isonuma, Junichiro Mori, Ichiro Sakata arxiv

As generative AI faces intensifying legal challenges, the machine learning community has increasingly relied on post-hoc mitigation -- especially machine unlearning and inference-time guardrails -- to argue for complianc…

Value Preferences Estimation and Disambiguation in Hybrid Participatory Systems

2024-02-26 · Enrico Liscio, Luciano C. Siebert, Catholijn M. Jonker, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah

Understanding citizens' values in participatory systems is crucial for citizen-centric policy-making. We envision a hybrid participatory system where participants make choices and provide motivations for those choices, a…

Active Learning

ADGym: Design Choices for Deep Anomaly Detection

2023-09-27 · NeurIPS 2023 11 · Minqi Jiang, Chaochuan Hou, Ao Zheng, Songqiao Han 외

Deep learning (DL) techniques have recently found success in anomaly detection (AD) across various fields such as finance, medical services, and cloud computing. However, most of the current research tends to view deep A…

Anomaly DetectionCloud Computing

Prior and Likelihood Choices for Bayesian Matrix Factorisation on Small Datasets

2017-12-01 · Thomas Brouwer, Pietro Lio'

In this paper, we study the effects of different prior and likelihood choices for Bayesian matrix factorisation, focusing on small datasets. These choices can greatly influence the predictive performance of the methods. …

Model Selection

The Paradox of Choice: Using Attention in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

2022-01-24 · Andrei Nica, Khimya Khetarpal, Doina Precup

Decision-making AI agents are often faced with two important challenges: the depth of the planning horizon, and the branching factor due to having many choices. Hierarchical reinforcement learning methods aim to solve th…

Decision MakingHierarchical Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning+1