AI Plays? δ-Rationality Games with Nash Equilibrium as Special Case
A distortion function, which captures the payoff gap between a player's actual payoff and her true payoff, is introduced and used to analyze games. In our proposed framework, we argue that players' actual payoff functions should be used to explain and predict their behaviors, while their true payoff functions should be used to conduct welfare analysis of the outcomes.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
The Focal Quantal Response Equilibrium
We propose a generalization of Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) built on a simple premise: some actions are more focal than others. In our model, which we call the Focal Quantal Response Equilibrium (Focal QRE), each p…
A Characterization of Nash Equilibrium in Behavioral Strategies through Local Sequential Rationality
The concept of Nash equilibrium in behavioral strategies (NashEBS) was formulated By Nash~\cite{Nash (1951)} for an extensive-form game through global rationality of nonconvex payoff functions. Kuhn's payoff equivalence …
FormCursed Sequential Equilibrium
This paper develops a framework to extend the strategic form analysis of cursed equilibrium (CE) developed by Eyster and Rabin (2005) to multi-stage games. The approach uses behavioral strategies rather than normal form …
FormReasoning and Behavioral Equilibria in LLM-Nash Games: From Mindsets to Actions
We introduce the LLM-Nash framework, a game-theoretic model where agents select reasoning prompts to guide decision-making via Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike classical games that assume utility-maximizing agents wi…
Safe Equilibrium
The standard game-theoretic solution concept, Nash equilibrium, assumes that all players behave rationally. If we follow a Nash equilibrium and opponents are irrational (or follow strategies from a different Nash equilib…
All