paper-with-me

Papers

AiReview: An Open Platform for Accelerating Systematic Reviews with LLMs

2025-04-05 · Xinyu Mao, Teerapong Leelanupab, Martin Potthast, Harrisen Scells, Guido Zuccon

Systematic reviews are fundamental to evidence-based medicine. Creating one is time-consuming and labour-intensive, mainly due to the need to screen, or assess, many studies for inclusion in the review. Several tools have been developed to streamline this process, mostly relying on traditional machine learning methods. Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in further accelerating the screening process. However, no tool currently allows end users to directly leverage LLMs for screening or facilitates systematic and transparent usage of LLM-assisted screening methods. This paper introduces (i) an extensible framework for applying LLMs to systematic review tasks, particularly title and abstract screening, and (ii) a web-based interface for LLM-assisted screening. Together, these elements form AiReview-a novel platform for LLM-assisted systematic review creation. AiReview is the first of its kind to bridge the gap between cutting-edge LLM-assisted screening methods and those that create medical systematic reviews. The tool is available at https://aireview.ielab.io. The source code is also open sourced at https://github.com/ielab/ai-review.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.04193

Code (1)

ielab/ai-review 공식 구현

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Benchmarking Agentic Review Systems

2026-06-18 · Dang Nguyen, Wanqing Hao, Yanai Elazar, Chenhao Tan arxiv

A new class of agentic review systems are emerging as a remedy to the pressure placed on peer review systems by AI-assisted research, but it is unclear how they should be evaluated. We evaluate two open-source systems (O…

The Impact of LLM-Generated Reviews on Recommender Systems: Textual Shifts, Performance Effects, and Strategic Platform Control

2025-11-02 · Itzhak Ziv, Moshe Unger, Hilah Geva arxiv

The rise of generative AI technologies is reshaping content-based recommender systems (RSes), which increasingly encounter AI-generated content alongside human-authored content. This study examines how the introduction o…

Trojan Horses in Amazon's Castle: Understanding the Incentivized Online Reviews

2018-06-06 · 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2018 6 · S Jamshidi, R Rejaie, J. Li

During the past few years, sellers have increasingly offered discounted or free products to selected reviewers of e-commerce platforms in exchange for their reviews. Such incentivized (and often very positive) reviews ca…

A Collection of Scholarly Book Reviews from the Platforms of electronic sources in Humanities and Social Sciences OpenEdition.org

2014-05-01 · LREC 2014 5 · Chahinez Benkoussas, Hussam Hamdan, Patrice Bellot, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric B{\'e}chet 외

In this paper, we present our contribution for the automatic construction of the Scholarly Book Reviews corpora from two different sources, the OpenEdition platform which is dedicated to electronic resources in the human…

Collaborative FilteringGenre classificationInformation Retrieval

OpenExtract: Automated Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Health

2026-03-06 · Jim Achterberg, Bram Van Dijk, Jing Meng, Saif Ul Islam 외 arxiv

This study presents OpenExtract, an open-source pipeline for automated data extraction in large-scale systematic literature reviews. The pipeline queries large language models (LLMs) to predict data entries based on rele…