paper-with-me

Papers

ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark

2025-10-01 · Harethah Abu Shairah, Somayah AlHarbi, Abdulaziz AlHussein, Sameer Alsabea, Omar Shaqaqi, Hebah AlShamlan, Omar Knio, George Turkiyyah arxiv

We introduce ALARB, a dataset and suite of tasks designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) within the Arabic legal domain. While existing Arabic benchmarks cover some knowledge-intensive tasks such as retrieval and understanding, substantial datasets focusing specifically on multistep reasoning for Arabic LLMs, especially in open-ended contexts, are lacking. The dataset comprises over 13K commercial court cases from Saudi Arabia, with each case including the facts presented, the reasoning of the court, the verdict, as well as the cited clauses extracted from the regulatory documents. We define a set of challenging tasks leveraging this dataset and reflecting the complexity of real-world legal reasoning, including verdict prediction, completion of reasoning chains in multistep legal arguments, and identification of relevant regulations based on case facts. We benchmark a representative selection of current open and closed Arabic LLMs on these tasks and demonstrate the dataset's utility for instruction tuning. Notably, we show that instruction-tuning a modest 12B parameter model using ALARB significantly enhances its performance in verdict prediction and Arabic verdict generation, reaching a level comparable to that of GPT-4o.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.00694

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Legal Reasoning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

MizanQA: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Moroccan Legal Question Answering

2025-08-22 · Adil Bahaj, Mounir Ghogho arxiv

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly propelled progress in natural language processing (NLP). However, their effectiveness in specialized, low-resource domains-such as Arabic legal cont…

Question AnsweringLegal Reasoning

LAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights

2024-10-17 · Odysseas S. Chlapanis, Dimitrios Galanis, Ion Androutsopoulos

We present Legal Argument Reasoning (LAR), a novel task designed to evaluate the legal reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). The task requires selecting the correct next statement (from multiple choice …

Legal ReasoningMultiple-choice

Benchmarking the Legal Reasoning of LLMs in Arabic Islamic Inheritance Cases

2025-08-13 · Nouar AlDahoul, Yasir Zaki arxiv

Islamic inheritance domain holds significant importance for Muslims to ensure fair distribution of shares between heirs. Manual calculation of shares under numerous scenarios is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. …

Legal Reasoning

An Argumentation-Based Legal Reasoning Approach for DL-Ontology

2022-09-07 · Zhe Yu, Yiwei Lu

Ontology is a popular method for knowledge representation in different domains, including the legal domain, and description logics (DL) is commonly used as its description language. To handle reasoning based on inconsist…

Autonomous VehiclesLegal Reasoning

The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure

2022-11-05 · Leonard Bongard, Lena Held, Ivan Habernal

We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil procedure. Each instance of the dataset consists of a general introduction to the case, a particular question, and a possible solution argument, acc…

Benchmarking