ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark
We introduce ALARB, a dataset and suite of tasks designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) within the Arabic legal domain. While existing Arabic benchmarks cover some knowledge-intensive tasks such as retrieval and understanding, substantial datasets focusing specifically on multistep reasoning for Arabic LLMs, especially in open-ended contexts, are lacking. The dataset comprises over 13K commercial court cases from Saudi Arabia, with each case including the facts presented, the reasoning of the court, the verdict, as well as the cited clauses extracted from the regulatory documents. We define a set of challenging tasks leveraging this dataset and reflecting the complexity of real-world legal reasoning, including verdict prediction, completion of reasoning chains in multistep legal arguments, and identification of relevant regulations based on case facts. We benchmark a representative selection of current open and closed Arabic LLMs on these tasks and demonstrate the dataset's utility for instruction tuning. Notably, we show that instruction-tuning a modest 12B parameter model using ALARB significantly enhances its performance in verdict prediction and Arabic verdict generation, reaching a level comparable to that of GPT-4o.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Legal ReasoningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
MizanQA: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Moroccan Legal Question Answering
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly propelled progress in natural language processing (NLP). However, their effectiveness in specialized, low-resource domains-such as Arabic legal cont…
Question AnsweringLegal ReasoningLAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights
We present Legal Argument Reasoning (LAR), a novel task designed to evaluate the legal reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). The task requires selecting the correct next statement (from multiple choice …
Legal ReasoningMultiple-choiceBenchmarking the Legal Reasoning of LLMs in Arabic Islamic Inheritance Cases
Islamic inheritance domain holds significant importance for Muslims to ensure fair distribution of shares between heirs. Manual calculation of shares under numerous scenarios is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. …
Legal ReasoningAn Argumentation-Based Legal Reasoning Approach for DL-Ontology
Ontology is a popular method for knowledge representation in different domains, including the legal domain, and description logics (DL) is commonly used as its description language. To handle reasoning based on inconsist…
Autonomous VehiclesLegal ReasoningThe Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure
We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil procedure. Each instance of the dataset consists of a general introduction to the case, a particular question, and a possible solution argument, acc…
Benchmarking