Algorithmic Administration and the EU AI Act: Legal Principles for Public Sector Use of AI
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) by public authorities introduces both opportunities for innovation and significant challenges for the administrative rule of law. This article examines how the EU AI Act interacts with the fundamental principles of administrative law, with a particular focus on administrative discretion, the duty to state reasons, and proportionality. It analyses the regulatory obligations imposed by the AI Act on public sector deployers of high-risk systems, especially in sensitive domains such as social benefits, migration, education, and law enforcement. It also explores whether the AI Act adequately ensures accountability, transparency, and reviewability in automated public decision-making. The article further considers how the AI Act's risk-based approach aligns (or fails to align) with the principle of proportionality and it proposes safeguards and interpretative strategies to ensure the ethical and lawful deployment of AI in the public sector.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirements
Deploying Large Language Model-based agents (LLM agents) in the public sector requires assuring that they meet the stringent legal, procedural, and structural requirements of public-sector institutions. Practitioners and…
Balancing Innovation and Integrity: AI Integration in Liberal Arts College Administration
This paper explores the intersection of artificial intelligence and higher education administration, focusing on liberal arts colleges (LACs). It examines AI's opportunities and challenges in academic and student affairs…
Human-AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision-Making: "Automation Bias" and "Selective Adherence" to Algorithmic Advice
Artificial intelligence algorithms are increasingly adopted as decisional aides by public bodies, with the promise of overcoming biases of human decision-makers. At the same time, they may introduce new biases in the hum…
Decision MakingHow do "technical" design-choices made when building algorithmic decision-making tools for criminal justice authorities create constitutional dangers?
This two part paper argues that seemingly "technical" choices made by developers of machine-learning based algorithmic tools used to inform decisions by criminal justice authorities can create serious constitutional dang…
Decision MakingAI Legal Companion: Enhancing Access to Justice and Legal Literacy for the Public
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the importance of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the legal sector to address the challenge of legal complexity and initiating the development of customized AI …
MisinformationRAGRetrieval-augmented Generation