Aligning the Pretraining and Finetuning Objectives of Language Models
We demonstrate that explicitly aligning the pretraining objectives to the finetuning objectives in language model training significantly improves the finetuning task performance and reduces the minimum amount of finetuning examples required. The performance margin gained from objective alignment allows us to build language models with smaller sizes for tasks with less available training data. We provide empirical evidence of these claims by applying objective alignment to concept-of-interest tagging and acronym detection tasks. We found that, with objective alignment, our 768 by 3 and 512 by 3 transformer language models can reach accuracy of 83.9%/82.5% for concept-of-interest tagging and 73.8%/70.2% for acronym detection using only 200 finetuning examples per task, outperforming the 768 by 3 model pretrained without objective alignment by +4.8%/+3.4% and +9.9%/+6.3%. We name finetuning small language models in the presence of hundreds of training examples or less "Few Example learning". In practice, Few Example Learning enabled by objective alignment not only saves human labeling costs, but also makes it possible to leverage language models in more real-time applications.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuning
Reward-based finetuning is crucial for aligning language policies with intended behaviors (e.g., creativity and safety). A key challenge is to develop steerable language models that trade-off multiple (conflicting) objec…
CleanCLIP: Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks in Multimodal Contrastive Learning
Multimodal contrastive pretraining has been used to train multimodal representation models, such as CLIP, on large amounts of paired image-text data. However, previous studies have revealed that such models are vulnerabl…
Backdoor AttackContrastive LearningData PoisoningLLM-JEPA: Large Language Models Meet Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures
Large Language Model (LLM) pretraining, finetuning, and evaluation rely on input-space reconstruction and generative capabilities. Yet, it has been observed in vision that embedding-space training objectives, e.g., with …
Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferences
Language models (LMs) are pretrained to imitate internet text, including content that would violate human preferences if generated by an LM: falsehoods, offensive comments, personally identifiable information, low-qualit…
Imitation LearningLanguage ModellingWhat Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?
Large pretrained Transformer language models have been shown to exhibit zero-shot generalization, i.e. they can perform a wide variety of tasks that they were not explicitly trained on. However, the architectures and pre…
DecoderLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingMasked Language Modeling+1