Alterfactual Explanations -- The Relevance of Irrelevance for Explaining AI Systems
Explanation mechanisms from the field of Counterfactual Thinking are a widely-used paradigm for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), as they follow a natural way of reasoning that humans are familiar with. However, all common approaches from this field are based on communicating information about features or characteristics that are especially important for an AI's decision. We argue that in order to fully understand a decision, not only knowledge about relevant features is needed, but that the awareness of irrelevant information also highly contributes to the creation of a user's mental model of an AI system. Therefore, we introduce a new way of explaining AI systems. Our approach, which we call Alterfactual Explanations, is based on showing an alternative reality where irrelevant features of an AI's input are altered. By doing so, the user directly sees which characteristics of the input data can change arbitrarily without influencing the AI's decision. We evaluate our approach in an extensive user study, revealing that it is able to significantly contribute to the participants' understanding of an AI. We show that alterfactual explanations are suited to convey an understanding of different aspects of the AI's reasoning than established counterfactual explanation methods.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualCounterfactual ExplanationExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Relevant Irrelevance: Generating Alterfactual Explanations for Image Classifiers
In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of alterfactual explanations for black box image classifiers. Traditional explanation mechanisms from the field of Counterfactual Thinking are a widely-used paradigm for Expl…
counterfactualExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)NoMatterXAI: Generating "No Matter What" Alterfactual Examples for Explaining Black-Box Text Classification Models
In Explainable AI (XAI), counterfactual explanations (CEs) are a well-studied method to communicate feature relevance through contrastive reasoning of "what if" to explain AI models' predictions. However, they only focus…
Attributecounterfactualtext-classificationText ClassificationCredal Networks under Epistemic Irrelevance
A credal network under epistemic irrelevance is a generalised type of Bayesian network that relaxes its two main building blocks. On the one hand, the local probabilities are allowed to be partially specified. On the oth…
Time-aware Self-Attention Meets Logic Reasoning in Recommender Systems
At the age of big data, recommender systems have shown remarkable success as a key means of information filtering in our daily life. Recent years have witnessed the technical development of recommender systems, from perc…
Logical ReasoningRecommendation SystemsOn the Complexity of Strong and Epistemic Credal Networks
Credal networks are graph-based statistical models whose parameters take values in a set, instead of being sharply specified as in traditional statistical models (e.g., Bayesian networks). The computational complexity of…