Ambiguity in Explicit Discourse Connectives
Discourse connectives are known to be subject to both usage and sense ambiguity, as has already been discussed in the literature. But discourse connectives are no different from other linguistic expressions in being subject to other types of ambiguity as well. Four are illustrated and discussed here.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
What Causes the Failure of Explicit to Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition?
We consider an unanswered question in the discourse processing community: why do relation classifiers trained on explicit examples (with connectives removed) perform poorly in real implicit scenarios? Prior work claimed …
RelationUsing Translation Process Data to Explore Explicitation and Implicitation through Discourse Connectives
We look into English-German translation process data to analyse explicitation and implicitation phenomena of discourse connectives. For this, we use the database CRITT TPR-DB which contains translation process data with …
TranslationAutomatic Disambiguation of French Discourse Connectives
Discourse connectives (e.g. however, because) are terms that can explicitly convey a discourse relation within a text. While discourse connectives have been shown to be an effective clue to automatically identify discour…
Translating Implicit Discourse Connectives Based on Cross-lingual Annotation and Alignment
Implicit discourse connectives and relations are distributed more widely in Chinese texts, when translating into English, such connectives are usually translated explicitly. Towards Chinese-English MT, in this paper we d…
Implicit RelationsMachine TranslationTranslationTCL - a Lexicon of Turkish Discourse Connectives
It is known that discourse connectives are the most salient indicators of discourse relations. State-of-the-art parsers being developed to predict explicit discourse connectives exploit annotated discourse corpora but a …