paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

An empirical study of a pruning mechanism

2021-01-01 · Minju Jung, Hyounguk Shon, Eojindl Yi, SungHyun Baek, Junmo Kim

Many methods aim to prune neural network to the maximum extent. However, there are few studies that investigate the pruning mechanism. In this work, we empirically investigate a standard framework for network pruning: pretraining large network and then pruning and retraining it. The framework has been commonly used based on heuristics, i.e., finding a good minima with a large network (pretraining phase) and retaining it with careful pruning and retraining (pruning and retraining phase). For the pretraining phase, the reason for which the large network is required to achieve good performance is examined. We hypothesize that this might come from the network relying on only a portion of its weights when trained from scratch. This way of weight utilization is referred to as imbalanced utility. The measures for weight utility and utility imbalance are proposed. We investigate the cause of the utility imbalance and the characteristics of the weight utility. For the pruning and retraining phase, whether the pruned-and-retrained network benefits from the pretrained network indded is examined. We visualize the accuracy surface of the pretrained, pruned and retrained networks and investigate the relation between them. The validation accuracy is also interpreted in association with the surface.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (1)

anonymous-authors-11/an_empirical_study_of_a_pruning_mechanism 공식 구현

Tasks

Network Pruning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Pruning 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models

2026-03-01 · Changwoo Baek, Jouwon Song, Sohyeon Kim, Kyeongbo Kong arxiv

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have adopted visual token pruning strategies to mitigate substantial computational overhead incurred by extensive visual token sequences. While prior works primarily focus on either a…

Cost-complexity pruning of random forests

2017-03-15 · Kiran Bangalore Ravi, Jean Serra

Random forests perform bootstrap-aggregation by sampling the training samples with replacement. This enables the evaluation of out-of-bag error which serves as a internal cross-validation mechanism. Our motivation lies i…

Implicit Filter Sparsification In Convolutional Neural Networks

2019-05-13 · Dushyant Mehta, Kwang In Kim, Christian Theobalt

We show implicit filter level sparsity manifests in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) which employ Batch Normalization and ReLU activation, and are trained with adaptive gradient descent techniques and L2 regularizati…

L2 Regularization

Sparse Training via Boosting Pruning Plasticity with Neuroregeneration

2021-06-19 · NeurIPS 2021 12 · Shiwei Liu, Tianlong Chen, Xiaohan Chen, Zahra Atashgahi 외

Works on lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) and single-shot network pruning (SNIP) have raised a lot of attention currently on post-training pruning (iterative magnitude pruning), and before-training pruning (pruning at ini…

Network PruningSparse Learning

Vote for Nearest Neighbors Meta-Pruning of Self-Supervised Networks

2021-09-29 · Haiyan Zhao, Tianyi Zhou, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang 외

Pruning plays an essential role in deploying deep neural nets (DNNs) to the hardware of limited memory or computation. However, current high-quality iterative pruning can create a terrible carbon footprint when compressi…