paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extraction

2020-05-01 · EMNLP 2020 11 · Bhargavi Paranjape, Mandar Joshi, John Thickstun, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke Zettlemoyer

Decisions of complex language understanding models can be rationalized by limiting their inputs to a relevant subsequence of the original text. A rationale should be as concise as possible without significantly degrading task performance, but this balance can be difficult to achieve in practice. In this paper, we show that it is possible to better manage this trade-off by optimizing a bound on the Information Bottleneck (IB) objective. Our fully unsupervised approach jointly learns an explainer that predicts sparse binary masks over sentences, and an end-task predictor that considers only the extracted rationale. Using IB, we derive a learning objective that allows direct control of mask sparsity levels through a tunable sparse prior. Experiments on ERASER benchmark tasks demonstrate significant gains over norm-minimization techniques for both task performance and agreement with human rationales. Furthermore, we find that in the semi-supervised setting, a modest amount of gold rationales (25% of training examples) closes the gap with a model that uses the full input.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2005.00652

Code (2)

bhargaviparanjape/explainable_qa 공식 구현 pytorch
princeton-nlp/rationale-robustness pytorch

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost

2024-07-29 · Sania Nayab, Giulio Rossolini, Marco Simoni, Andrea Saracino 외

Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness …

GSM8KPrompt EngineeringQuestion Answering

Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales

2023-05-11 · Brihi Joshi, Ziyi Liu, Sahana Ramnath, Aaron Chan 외

Among the remarkable emergent capabilities of large language models (LMs) is free-text rationalization; beyond a certain scale, large LMs are capable of generating seemingly useful rationalizations, which in turn, can dr…

The Sufficiency-Conciseness Trade-off in LLM Self-Explanation from an Information Bottleneck Perspective

2026-02-15 · Ali Zahedzadeh, Behnam Bahrak arxiv

Large Language Models increasingly rely on self-explanations, such as chain of thought reasoning, to improve performance on multi step question answering. While these explanations enhance accuracy, they are often verbose…

Question Answering

Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Tasks

2023-11-09 · Aditi Mishra, Sajjadur Rahman, Hannah Kim, Kushan Mitra 외

Large language models (LLMs) are proficient at generating fluent text with minimal task-specific supervision. Yet, their ability to provide well-grounded rationalizations for knowledge-intensive tasks remains under-explo…

Multiple-choiceWorld Knowledge

Investigating the Benefits of Free-Form Rationales

2022-01-16 · ACL ARR January 2022 1 · Anonymous

Free-form rationales aim to aid model interpretability by supplying the background knowledge that can help understand model decisions. Crowdsourced rationales are provided for commonsense QA instances in popular datasets…

Form