An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extraction
Decisions of complex language understanding models can be rationalized by limiting their inputs to a relevant subsequence of the original text. A rationale should be as concise as possible without significantly degrading task performance, but this balance can be difficult to achieve in practice. In this paper, we show that it is possible to better manage this trade-off by optimizing a bound on the Information Bottleneck (IB) objective. Our fully unsupervised approach jointly learns an explainer that predicts sparse binary masks over sentences, and an end-task predictor that considers only the extracted rationale. Using IB, we derive a learning objective that allows direct control of mask sparsity levels through a tunable sparse prior. Experiments on ERASER benchmark tasks demonstrate significant gains over norm-minimization techniques for both task performance and agreement with human rationales. Furthermore, we find that in the semi-supervised setting, a modest amount of gold rationales (25% of training examples) closes the gap with a model that uses the full input.
Code (2)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost
Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness …
GSM8KPrompt EngineeringQuestion AnsweringAre Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales
Among the remarkable emergent capabilities of large language models (LMs) is free-text rationalization; beyond a certain scale, large LMs are capable of generating seemingly useful rationalizations, which in turn, can dr…
The Sufficiency-Conciseness Trade-off in LLM Self-Explanation from an Information Bottleneck Perspective
Large Language Models increasingly rely on self-explanations, such as chain of thought reasoning, to improve performance on multi step question answering. While these explanations enhance accuracy, they are often verbose…
Question AnsweringCharacterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Tasks
Large language models (LLMs) are proficient at generating fluent text with minimal task-specific supervision. Yet, their ability to provide well-grounded rationalizations for knowledge-intensive tasks remains under-explo…
Multiple-choiceWorld KnowledgeInvestigating the Benefits of Free-Form Rationales
Free-form rationales aim to aid model interpretability by supplying the background knowledge that can help understand model decisions. Crowdsourced rationales are provided for commonsense QA instances in popular datasets…
Form