An Outcome Model Approach to Translating a Randomized Controlled Trial Results to a Target Population
Participants enrolled into randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often do not reflect real-world populations. Previous research in how best to translate RCT results to target populations has focused on weighting RCT data to look like the target data. Simulation work, however, has suggested that an outcome model approach may be preferable. Here we describe such an approach using source data from the 2x2 factorial NAVIGATOR trial which evaluated the impact of valsartan and nateglinide on cardiovascular outcomes and new-onset diabetes in a pre-diabetic population. Our target data consisted of people with pre-diabetes serviced at our institution. We used Random Survival Forests to develop separate outcome models for each of the 4 treatments, estimating the 5-year risk difference for progression to diabetes and estimated the treatment effect in our local patient populations, as well as sub-populations, and the results compared to the traditional weighting approach. Our models suggested that the treatment effect for valsartan in our patient population was the same as in the trial, whereas for nateglinide treatment effect was stronger than observed in the original trial. Our effect estimates were more efficient than the weighting approach.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Extracting relations between outcomes and significance levels in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) publications
Randomized controlled trials assess the effects of an experimental intervention by comparing it to a control intervention with regard to some variables - trial outcomes. Statistical hypothesis testing is used to test if …
Two-sample testingAutomated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the gold standard for testing causal hypotheses in the clinical domain. However, the investigation of prognostic variables of patient outcome in a hypothesized cause-…
Causal InferenceOptimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), treatment is often assigned by stratified randomization. I show that among all stratified randomization schemes which treat all units with probability one half, a certain matched-p…
Clustering and External Validity in Randomized Controlled Trials
The randomization inference literature studying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assumes that units' potential outcomes are deterministic. This assumption is unlikely to hold, as stochastic shocks may take place durin…
ClusteringAutomatically Extracting Numerical Results from Randomized Controlled Trials with Large Language Models
Meta-analyses statistically aggregate the findings of different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess treatment effectiveness. Because this yields robust estimates of treatment effectiveness, results from meta-an…