paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Anchoring Theory in Sequential Stackelberg Games

2019-12-07 · Jan Karwowski, Jacek Mańdziuk, Adam Żychowski

An underlying assumption of Stackelberg Games (SGs) is perfect rationality of the players. However, in real-life situations (which are often modeled by SGs) the followers (terrorists, thieves, poachers or smugglers) -- as humans in general -- may act not in a perfectly rational way, as their decisions may be affected by biases of various kinds which bound rationality of their decisions. One of the popular models of bounded rationality (BR) is Anchoring Theory (AT) which claims that humans have a tendency to flatten probabilities of available options, i.e. they perceive a distribution of these probabilities as being closer to the uniform distribution than it really is. This paper proposes an efficient formulation of AT in sequential extensive-form SGs (named ATSG), suitable for Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) solution methods. ATSG is implemented in three MILP/LP-based state-of-the-art methods for solving sequential SGs and two recently introduced non-MILP approaches: one relying on Monte Carlo sampling (O2UCT) and the other one (EASG) employing Evolutionary Algorithms. Experimental evaluation indicates that both non-MILP heuristic approaches scale better in time than MILP solutions while providing optimal or close-to-optimal solutions. Except for competitive time scalability, an additional asset of non-MILP methods is flexibility of potential BR formulations they are able to incorporate. While MILP approaches accept BR formulations with linear constraints only, no restrictions on the BR form are imposed in either of the two non-MILP methods.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1912.03564

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Evolutionary Algorithms

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Computation of Stackelberg Equilibria of Finite Sequential Games

2015-07-28 · Branislav Bosansky, Simina Branzei, Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Peter Bro Miltersen 외

The Stackelberg equilibrium solution concept describes optimal strategies to commit to: Player 1 (termed the leader) publicly commits to a strategy and Player 2 (termed the follower) plays a best response to this strateg…

Robust No-Regret Learning in Min-Max Stackelberg Games

2022-03-26 · AAAI Workshop AdvML 2022 2 · Denizalp Goktas, Jiayi Zhao, Amy Greenwald

The behavior of no-regret learning algorithms is well understood in two-player min-max (i.e, zero-sum) games. In this paper, we investigate the behavior of no-regret learning in min-max games with dependent strategy sets…

Riemannian Manifold Learning for Stackelberg Games with Neural Flow Representations

2025-02-08 · Larkin Liu, Kashif Rasul, Yutong Chao, Jalal Etesami

We present a novel framework for online learning in Stackelberg general-sum games, where two agents, the leader and follower, engage in sequential turn-based interactions. At the core of this approach is a learned diffeo…

Convergence of Learning Dynamics in Stackelberg Games

2019-06-04 · Tanner Fiez, Benjamin Chasnov, Lillian J. Ratliff

This paper investigates the convergence of learning dynamics in Stackelberg games. In the class of games we consider, there is a hierarchical game being played between a leader and a follower with continuous action space…

Gradient Methods for Solving Stackelberg Games

2019-08-19 · Roi Naveiro, David Ríos Insua

Stackelberg Games are gaining importance in the last years due to the raise of Adversarial Machine Learning (AML). Within this context, a new paradigm must be faced: in classical game theory, intervening agents were huma…