paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

AppSelectBench: Application-Level Tool Selection Benchmark

2025-11-25 · Tianyi Chen, Michael Solodko, Sen Wang, Jongwoo Ko, Junheng Hao, Colby Banbury, Sara Abdali, Saeed Amizadeh, Qing Xiao, Yinheng Li, Tianyu Ding, Kamran Ghasedi Dizaji, Suzhen Zheng, Hao Fan, Justin Wagle, Pashmina Cameron, Kazuhito Koishida arxiv

Computer Using Agents (CUAs) are increasingly equipped with external tools, enabling them to perform complex and realistic tasks. For CUAs to operate effectively, application selection, which refers to deciding which application to use before invoking fine-grained tools such as APIs, is a fundamental capability. It determines whether the agent initializes the correct environment, avoids orchestration confusion, and efficiently focuses on relevant context. However, existing benchmarks primarily assess fine-grained API selection, offering limited insight into whether models can reason across and choose between different applications. To fill this gap, we introduce AppSelectBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating application selection in CUAs. AppSelectBench contains a novel user task generation pipeline that produces realistic, diverse, and semantically grounded user intents at scale, together with unified evaluation protocols covering random, heuristic, zero-shot, few-shot, and retrieval-augmented-settings. AppSelectBench covers one hundred widely used desktop applications and includes more than one hundred thousand realistic, diverse, and semantically grounded user tasks. Extensive experiments across both closed-source and open-source large language models reveal systematic strengths and weaknesses in inter-application reasoning, showing that even the most capable models still struggle to make consistent application choices. Together, these results establish AppSelectBench as a foundation for studying and advancing application level reasoning, an essential yet underexplored capability of intelligent CUAs. The source is available at https://microsoft.github.io/appselectbench/.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.19957

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

BiasBusters: Uncovering and Mitigating Tool Selection Bias in Large Language Models

2025-09-30 · Thierry Blankenstein, Jialin Yu, Zixuan Li, Vassilis Plachouras 외 arxiv

Agents backed by large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools drawn from marketplaces where multiple providers offer functionally equivalent options. This raises a critical fairness concern: systemati…

Premise Selection for Mathematics by Corpus Analysis and Kernel Methods

2011-08-17 · Jesse Alama, Tom Heskes, Daniel Kühlwein, Evgeni Tsivtsivadze 외

Smart premise selection is essential when using automated reasoning as a tool for large-theory formal proof development. A good method for premise selection in complex mathematical libraries is the application of machine…

Mathematical Proofs

ArtisanGS: Interactive Tools for Gaussian Splat Selection with AI and Human in the Loop

2026-02-10 · Clement Fuji Tsang, Anita Hu, Or Perel, Carsten Kolve 외 arxiv

Representation in the family of 3D Gaussian Splats (3DGS) are growing into a viable alternative to traditional graphics for an expanding number of application, including recent techniques that facilitate physics simulati…

MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use

2023-10-04 · Yue Huang, Jiawen Shi, Yuan Li, Chenrui Fan 외

Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention due to their impressive natural language processing (NLP) capabilities. Recently, many studies have focused on the tool utilization ability of LLMs. They p…

Decision Making

TRAJECT-Bench:A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool Use

2025-10-06 · Pengfei He, Zhenwei Dai, Bing He, Hui Liu 외 arxiv

Large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly rely on tool use to complete real-world tasks. While existing works evaluate the LLMs' tool use capability, they largely focus on the final answers yet overlook the de…