Are Sex-based Physiological Differences the Cause of Gender Bias for Chest X-ray Diagnosis?
While many studies have assessed the fairness of AI algorithms in the medical field, the causes of differences in prediction performance are often unknown. This lack of knowledge about the causes of bias hampers the efficacy of bias mitigation, as evidenced by the fact that simple dataset balancing still often performs best in reducing performance gaps but is unable to resolve all performance differences. In this work, we investigate the causes of gender bias in machine learning-based chest X-ray diagnosis. In particular, we explore the hypothesis that breast tissue leads to underexposure of the lungs and causes lower model performance. Methodologically, we propose a new sampling method which addresses the highly skewed distribution of recordings per patient in two widely used public datasets, while at the same time reducing the impact of label errors. Our comprehensive analysis of gender differences across diseases, datasets, and gender representations in the training set shows that dataset imbalance is not the sole cause of performance differences. Moreover, relative group performance differs strongly between datasets, indicating important dataset-specific factors influencing male/female group performance. Finally, we investigate the effect of breast tissue more specifically, by cropping out the breasts from recordings, finding that this does not resolve the observed performance gaps. In conclusion, our results indicate that dataset-specific factors, not fundamental physiological differences, are the main drivers of male--female performance gaps in chest X-ray analyses on widely used NIH and CheXpert Dataset.
Code (1)
Tasks
FairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Semi-Supervised Topic Modeling for Gender Bias Discovery in English and Swedish
Gender bias has been identified in many models for Natural Language Processing, stemming from implicit biases in the text corpora used to train the models. Such corpora are too large to closely analyze for biased or ster…
ArticlesTopic ModelsOn the "Illusion" of Gender Bias in Face Recognition: Explaining the Fairness Issue Through Non-demographic Attributes
Face recognition systems (FRS) exhibit significant accuracy differences based on the user's gender. Since such a gender gap reduces the trustworthiness of FRS, more recent efforts have tried to find the causes. However, …
AttributeFace RecognitionFairnessThe Resume Paradox: Greater Language Differences, Smaller Pay Gaps
Over the past decade, the gender pay gap has remained steady with women earning 84 cents for every dollar earned by men on average. Many studies explain this gap through demand-side bias in the labor market represented t…
Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems promise to deliver objective interpretation of human speech. Practice and recent evidence suggests that the state-of-the-art (SotA) ASRs struggle with the large variation in spe…
Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)speech-recognitionSpeech RecognitionThe influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment: An international validation of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire in 8 countries
INTRODUCTION: To understand the potential influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment in dementia, we aimed to investigate possible bias caused by age, gender, education, and cultural differences. …
Cultural Vocal Bursts Intensity PredictionDiversity