paper-with-me

Papers

ArgRewrite V.2: an Annotated Argumentative Revisions Corpus

2022-06-03 · Omid Kashefi, Tazin Afrin, Meghan Dale, Christopher Olshefski, Amanda Godley, Diane Litman, Rebecca Hwa

Analyzing how humans revise their writings is an interesting research question, not only from an educational perspective but also in terms of artificial intelligence. Better understanding of this process could facilitate many NLP applications, from intelligent tutoring systems to supportive and collaborative writing environments. Developing these applications, however, requires revision corpora, which are not widely available. In this work, we present ArgRewrite V.2, a corpus of annotated argumentative revisions, collected from two cycles of revisions to argumentative essays about self-driving cars. Annotations are provided at different levels of purpose granularity (coarse and fine) and scope (sentential and subsentential). In addition, the corpus includes the revision goal given to each writer, essay scores, annotation verification, pre- and post-study surveys collected from participants as meta-data. The variety of revision unit scope and purpose granularity levels in ArgRewrite, along with the inclusion of new types of meta-data, can make it a useful resource for research and applications that involve revision analysis. We demonstrate some potential applications of ArgRewrite V.2 in the development of automatic revision purpose predictors, as a training source and benchmark.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2206.01677

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Self-Driving Cars

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Corpus of Annotated Revisions for Studying Argumentative Writing

2017-07-01 · ACL 2017 7 · Fan Zhang, Homa B. Hashemi, Rebecca Hwa, Diane Litman

This paper presents ArgRewrite, a corpus of between-draft revisions of argumentative essays. Drafts are manually aligned at the sentence level, and the writer{'}s purpose for each revision is annotated with categories an…

Argument MiningSentence

Annotation and Classification of Sentence-level Revision Improvement

2019-09-03 · WS 2018 6 · Tazin Afrin, Diane Litman

Studies of writing revisions rarely focus on revision quality. To address this issue, we introduce a corpus of between-draft revisions of student argumentative essays, annotated as to whether each revision improves essay…

BIG-bench Machine LearningClassificationGeneral ClassificationSentence

ArgRewrite: A Web-based Revision Assistant for Argumentative Writings

2016-06-01 · NAACL 2016 6 · Fan Zhang, Rebecca Hwa, Diane Litman, Homa B. Hashemi

Argumentation Element Annotation Modeling using XLNet

2023-11-10 · Christopher Ormerod, Amy Burkhardt, Mackenzie Young, Sue Lottridge

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of XLNet, a transformer-based language model, for annotating argumentative elements in persuasive essays. XLNet's architecture incorporates a recurrent mechanism that allows it t…

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

An Argument-Annotated Corpus of Scientific Publications

2018-11-01 · WS 2018 11 · Anne Lauscher, Goran Glava{\v{s}}, Simone Paolo Ponzetto

Argumentation is an essential feature of scientific language. We present an annotation study resulting in a corpus of scientific publications annotated with argumentative components and relations. The argumentative annot…

Argument Mining