Argument Relation Classification Using a Joint Inference Model
In this paper, we address the problem of argument relation classification where argument units are from different texts. We design a joint inference method for the task by modeling argument relation classification and stance classification jointly. We show that our joint model improves the results over several strong baselines.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument MiningClassificationGeneral ClassificationmodelRelationRelation ClassificationStance ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Annotation-Inspired Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with Auxiliary Discourse Connective Generation
Implicit discourse relation classification is a challenging task due to the absence of discourse connectives. To overcome this issue, we design an end-to-end neural model to explicitly generate discourse connectives for …
Implicit Discourse Relation ClassificationRelationRelation ClassificationA Novel Joint Framework for Multiple Chinese Events Extraction
Event extraction is an essential yet challenging task in information extraction. Previous approaches have paid little attention to the problem of roles overlap which is a common phenomenon in practice. To solve this prob…
Event ExtractionLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingRelationA Joint Framework for Argumentative Text Analysis Incorporating Domain Knowledge
For argumentation mining, there are several sub-tasks such as argumentation component type classification, relation classification. Existing research tends to solve such sub-tasks separately, but ignore the close relatio…
General ClassificationRelationRelation ClassificationArgument Mining with Structured SVMs and RNNs
We propose a novel factor graph model for argument mining, designed for settings in which the argumentative relations in a document do not necessarily form a tree structure. (This is the case in over 20% of the web comme…
Argument MiningGeneral ClassificationRelation Prediction"Laughing at you or with you": The Role of Sarcasm in Shaping the Disagreement Space
Detecting arguments in online interactions is useful to understand how conflicts arise and get resolved. Users often use figurative language, such as sarcasm, either as persuasive devices or to attack the opponent by an …
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationRelationRelation Classification+1