Argumentation-Driven Evidence Association in Criminal Cases
Evidence association in criminal cases is dividing a set of judicial evidence into several non-overlapping subsets, improving the interpretability and legality of conviction. Observably, evidence divided into the same subset usually supports the same claim. Therefore, we propose an argumentation-driven supervised learning method to calculate the distance between evidence pairs for the following evidence association step in this paper. Experimental results on a real-world dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Machine Learning Partners in Criminal Networks
Recent research has shown that criminal networks have complex organizational structures, but whether this can be used to predict static and dynamic properties of criminal networks remains little explored. Here, by combin…
Graph Representation LearningRepresentation LearningThe Cases LJP Never Sees: Prosecution Decision Prediction for More Complete Criminal Liability Assessment
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become a core benchmark for evaluating AI in the criminal legal domain, but it only sees criminal cases that have already passed prosecutorial review and been formally indicted. As a r…
HiTZ@Antidote: Argumentation-driven Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Digital Medicine
Providing high quality explanations for AI predictions based on machine learning is a challenging and complex task. To work well it requires, among other factors: selecting a proper level of generality/specificity of the…
Decision MakingExplainable artificial intelligenceSpecificityExplainable Automated Reasoning in Law using Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation
Applying automated reasoning tools for decision support and analysis in law has the potential to make court decisions more transparent and objective. Since there is often uncertainty about the accuracy and relevance of e…
Integrating Testing and Operation-related Quantitative Evidences in Assurance Cases to Argue Safety of Data-Driven AI/ML Components
In the future, AI will increasingly find its way into systems that can potentially cause physical harm to humans. For such safety-critical systems, it must be demonstrated that their residual risk does not exceed what is…